Who Sold Out The 2011 Premiers?
- Thread starter bones
- Start date
Utility Player
Bencher
My bet as well.tookey said:
If they had replica's made who would know the difference and what emotional ties would a ring have for a former short term director.
Hamster Huey
Space Invader
bones said:
Not that cheap, he wouldn't. How could he respect anybody that thinks his ring comes that cheap. At least buy him a drink first.
bones said:
I see what you did there!
Who has retired , and who faces tough financial times.......don't know the answer but that would be the first to look to.
Despite our current dislike of Watamouth , doubt it would be him.
Despite our current dislike of Watamouth , doubt it would be him.
I would be surprised if it was part of the playing group / the 17 who played on the day, rather i would think an 18th man (was it Cuthbo for 2008?) or one of the support staff would be a more sound bet....especially considering the recent sell off
I am just shocked and surprised that the Tele decided to go down the sensational angle....
I am just shocked and surprised that the Tele decided to go down the sensational angle....
Daddycool08
Reserve Grader
It could be a board member as well.
I got that feeling when I read the article.
In NFL there are two types of rings - players and support staff. While both are similar they are different and that can affect the value.
I wonder in hind sight whether the 'board's' rings should not have been a little different in design from the player's rings.
I got that feeling when I read the article.
In NFL there are two types of rings - players and support staff. While both are similar they are different and that can affect the value.
I wonder in hind sight whether the 'board's' rings should not have been a little different in design from the player's rings.
If you look at who sold it on ebay, this person looks like a regular seller of jewellery.
I'd say whoever the player was, has sold it to this person & is now being sold again on ebay. I doubt very much the ebay id belongs to anyone connected with the club.
My guess is Darcy Lussick. De$ gave Darcy his ring after De$ left him out of the team. It was a nice gesture but i think Darcy would like one he felt he earned through actually playing on the day. It may be a painful reminder for him & decided to get rid of it.
Thats only my take and i may be way off the mark.
Wished i had've known & had the money to buy it myself.
I'd say whoever the player was, has sold it to this person & is now being sold again on ebay. I doubt very much the ebay id belongs to anyone connected with the club.
My guess is Darcy Lussick. De$ gave Darcy his ring after De$ left him out of the team. It was a nice gesture but i think Darcy would like one he felt he earned through actually playing on the day. It may be a painful reminder for him & decided to get rid of it.
Thats only my take and i may be way off the mark.
Wished i had've known & had the money to buy it myself.
Bandit
Reserve Grader
manlywarringah said:
Lussick was still suspended 4 the GF, afta battle of brookie v storm.
Hasless didn't omit Lussick from team, but as he'd made good contribution all year, gave Lussick his ring.
As we learnt 24 hours later, Judas had already signed up with Greenturd's Dogs.
No honour in taking from this backstabber.
Pretty sure Lussick was back available for selection for the GF but was left out. His suspension wouldn't have been any longer than Stewarts
stoodamire
Bencher
Joe Galavao
His niece or cousin got charged with killing a pedestrian. Legal fees Aren't cheap I think.
He's a giving person like that.
My guess is him
His niece or cousin got charged with killing a pedestrian. Legal fees Aren't cheap I think.
He's a giving person like that.
My guess is him
Users who are viewing this thread
Staff online
-
JethroStar Trekkin' across the universe
Latest posts
2020 Ladder
| Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
| 2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
| 3 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
| 4 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
| 5 | Raiders | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 10 |
| 6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
| 7 | Sharks | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 8 |
| 8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
| 9 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
| 10 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
| 11 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
| 12 | Tigers | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 6 |
| 13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
| 14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
| 15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
| 16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
| 17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |
