Yeah I don't understand that one. It's not called benefit of the doubt any more, but the ref decided it was a try and the video ref should only overrule if it is shown conclusively to be wrong. And it wasn't conclusive.Ramrod said:Wolfie's try was a fair try! He had at least one hand on it all the way down. Why was there no benefit of the doubt? Will Hayne complain about this 50/50 call that went their way?
"Unless I'm blind!!"