Toni Carroll

[quote author=DSM5]
Carroll has the mongrel that youz all seem to think is required in a player of the modern game. When he goes ferrell youz can't cope. His hits were hard and now, duly ajudicated on, judged entirely legal. And Fluffster who scored 18 points to zip? I didn't get that line. Even Hindmarsh says he was held up, 12 zip. And surely you must admit now that the better team won. Simple really, go on, admit it now, it won't hurt. c'mon

Hang on, you have spent 2 weeks hammering Matai for 1 high shot, Carroll does 1 of those plus others during the game, and they are just 'hard' in your eyes ?

Another correciton for you, Hindmarsh has not stated he was held up

And for some explantion on Fluffys point, 6-0 Qld turning into 18-6 NSW is 18-0
Back to the drawing board ol' son
[/quote]

Ah- no it's not it is 12- 0. As for QLD second half it is 19-0.

Back to the drawing board ol' son 😉
 
if the score was 18-0 in the first half you would have scored 18 to zip. Was not the score 18-6? In the second half we scored 19 points your side scored none, therefore the second half was 19-0. is it that hard for you to understand?
 
Nodd NSW scored 18 points to QLD's nil in the period after QLD scored 6 points so in effect NSW put on 1 less unanswerd point than QLD did in the 2nd half. The fact that QLD had scored 6 does not change the argument.

That said the better team won.
 
Nodd NSW scored 18 points to QLD's nil in the period after QLD scored 6 points so in effect NSW put on 1 less unanswerd point than QLD did in the 2nd half. The fact that QLD had scored 6 does not change the argument.

That said the better team won.

OK Apologies to fluff and kiwi
 
[quote author=Kiwi Eagle]
[quote author=DSM5]
Carroll has the mongrel that youz all seem to think is required in a player of the modern game. When he goes ferrell youz can't cope. His hits were hard and now, duly ajudicated on, judged entirely legal. And Fluffster who scored 18 points to zip? I didn't get that line. Even Hindmarsh says he was held up, 12 zip. And surely you must admit now that the better team won. Simple really, go on, admit it now, it won't hurt. c'mon

Hang on, you have spent 2 weeks hammering Matai for 1 high shot, Carroll does 1 of those plus others during the game, and they are just 'hard' in your eyes ?

Another correciton for you, Hindmarsh has not stated he was held up

And for some explantion on Fluffys point, 6-0 Qld turning into 18-6 NSW is 18-0
Back to the drawing board ol' son
[/quote]

Ah- no it's not it is 12- 0. As for QLD second half it is 19-0.

Back to the drawing board ol' son 😉

[/quote]

Will do my best to make it as simple as possible for ya champ 😀

Qld 6-0, 6 unanswered points Qld

NSW 18-6, 18 unanswered points NSW :dance:

QLD 26-18, 19 unanswered points QLD :doh:

Board still syaing 18 pts NSW :drunk:
 
[quote author=Utility Player]
Nodd NSW scored 18 points to QLD's nil in the period after QLD scored 6 points so in effect NSW put on 1 less unanswerd point than QLD did in the 2nd half. The fact that QLD had scored 6 does not change the argument.

That said the better team won.

OK Apologies to fluff and kiwi
[/quote]

No worries mate. Do you have your little pic under your name in video form 😉
 
Never apologise Nodd, especially over someone's use of statistcs. They can be manipulated to score any cheap point. The irrifutable point is that the Qld pack smashed the NSW one and thus won the game (all these NSW wankers don't want to admit that). Anyway I'd buy Carroll anyday and put him in the manly pack. He'd be awesome.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom