To the people saying there’s enough allegedly acquired for multiple people, yes that is certainly plausible.
However that doesn’t automatically mean every one of those 8 players condoned, partook or was even aware of it.
Without that proof, the roosters can’t take any action against any of those other players.
Taking action against Radley is even a stretch given he hasn’t been charged with anything - there’s questions whether they even have grounds to sack him and not carry it on their cap. The RLPA will certainly make noise.
Saying the roosters must sack all eight, when there is no proof aside from “there was enough for multiple people” is one of the most ridiculous claims I’ve ever heard.