clontaago
First Grader
Put together by an Econ Professor in U of NSW....Compulsory Reading
The latest tax cuts explained
2005 Budget
Here is the real story to lighten the Budget discussion! You've heard
the cry in the last couple of weeks from across Australia: "It's just a
tax cut for the rich!", and it is accepted as fact. But what does that
really mean?
The following explanation may help.
Suppose that every night, 10 men go out for dinner at a restaurant.
The bill for all 10 comes to $100.They decided to pay their bill the
way we pay our taxes, and it went like this:
* The first four men (the poorest) paid nothing.
* The fifth paid $1.
* The sixth $3.
* The seventh $7.
* The eighth $12.
* The ninth $18.
* The tenth man (the richest) paid $59.
All 10 were quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner
said: "Since you are all such good customers, I'm going to reduce the
cost of your daily meal by $20."
So now dinner for the 10 only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay
their bill the way we pay our taxes. The first four men were
unaffected. They would still eat for free. But how should the other
six, the paying customers, divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone
would get his "fair share"?
They realised that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody's share, then the fifth and sixth men would each end
up being paid to eat. The restaurateur suggested reducing each man's
bill by roughly the same percentage, thus:
* The fifth man paid nothing (like the first four) instead of $1
(100%saving).
* The sixth paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
* The seventh paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
* The eighth paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
* The ninth paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
* The tenth paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off, and the first four continued to eat for
free, as now did the fifth - but outside the restaurant, the men began
to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He
pointed to the tenth man "but he got $10!"
"That's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar too.
It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"
"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back
when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the
tenth man didn't show up for dinner. The nine sat down and ate without
him, but when they came to pay the bill, they discovered that they
didn't have enough money between all of them to meet even half of the
bill!
That, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.
There are lots of good restaurants in Monaco and the Caribbean.
David R. Kamerschen, Professor of Economics, University of NSW.
The latest tax cuts explained
2005 Budget
Here is the real story to lighten the Budget discussion! You've heard
the cry in the last couple of weeks from across Australia: "It's just a
tax cut for the rich!", and it is accepted as fact. But what does that
really mean?
The following explanation may help.
Suppose that every night, 10 men go out for dinner at a restaurant.
The bill for all 10 comes to $100.They decided to pay their bill the
way we pay our taxes, and it went like this:
* The first four men (the poorest) paid nothing.
* The fifth paid $1.
* The sixth $3.
* The seventh $7.
* The eighth $12.
* The ninth $18.
* The tenth man (the richest) paid $59.
All 10 were quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner
said: "Since you are all such good customers, I'm going to reduce the
cost of your daily meal by $20."
So now dinner for the 10 only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay
their bill the way we pay our taxes. The first four men were
unaffected. They would still eat for free. But how should the other
six, the paying customers, divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone
would get his "fair share"?
They realised that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted
that from everybody's share, then the fifth and sixth men would each end
up being paid to eat. The restaurateur suggested reducing each man's
bill by roughly the same percentage, thus:
* The fifth man paid nothing (like the first four) instead of $1
(100%saving).
* The sixth paid $2 instead of $3 (33% saving).
* The seventh paid $5 instead of $7 (28% saving).
* The eighth paid $9 instead of $12 (25% saving).
* The ninth paid $14 instead of $18 (22% saving).
* The tenth paid $49 instead of $59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off, and the first four continued to eat for
free, as now did the fifth - but outside the restaurant, the men began
to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He
pointed to the tenth man "but he got $10!"
"That's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar too.
It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"
"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back
when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the
tenth man didn't show up for dinner. The nine sat down and ate without
him, but when they came to pay the bill, they discovered that they
didn't have enough money between all of them to meet even half of the
bill!
That, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table anymore.
There are lots of good restaurants in Monaco and the Caribbean.
David R. Kamerschen, Professor of Economics, University of NSW.