Taniela Paseka ... it's time ..

Edited due to SPAM

SPAM.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Club obviously rates him and with the longer term contract extension last season or so .
When uninjured , definitely can play a very influential role and fairly consistent the past few seasons .
Suggestions that he was not that far off S O O selection last season were not that far off the mark
Don "t mind the likely prop grouping of Tent and Taukeiaho starting , then Bully , Jake , Alioia or Sipley playing a role there then .
Even Lodge again , may have something to offer if an opportunity presents itself .
More of a priority to sort out the 9 and 13 roles then any doubt on Tent 's largely good value to the team
 
Paseka had a great game but on reflection he was even better than I thought.
The decoy run he took in the opening minutes made sure Haumole had a one-on-one go at the line, which meant a certain try.
I also just checked his stats (NRL) and for comparison
Haumole -15 runs - 156 m - 68m post contact (many aimed at young Perdue and little terrier Dearden)
Taniela - 16 - 152m - 63m (all into the meat of the Cows pack)
add a line break assist and try assist to Cherry
tackle efficiency 100%
 
And here is the problem, plays well for one match in a row, then back to being a giant plodder.
Mate, how about you consolidate your thoughts in a single post instead of bringing up literally every single different thread to enhance your negative, uninformative viewpoints? It's honestly verging on spam across all these threads.
 
Paseka is a good prop, probably our best but our pack lacks an on-field leader. I said before the game tonight if we were going to be beaten, it was through the middle and here we are.

Someone in the Matthew Lodge, Nathan Brown mould but not 100 years old. We seriously lack aggression to the point that sometimes it looks like Jake is the angriest, at least in defense. We don't have the ability to 'turn the tide' in defense, Haumole can smash anyone but he's out on an edge.
 
Mate, how about you consolidate your thoughts in a single post instead of bringing up literally every single different thread to enhance your negative, uninformative viewpoints? It's honestly verging on spam across all these threads.

Mate, it's spam that there are so many threads about the same person or subject.
It seems everyone on this site is too lazy to do the search function or don't understand it even exists.

Everyone know and then I like to make this stupidity obvious.
 
Mate, it's spam that there are so many threads about the same person or subject.
It seems everyone on this site is too lazy to do the search function or don't understand it even exists.

Everyone know and then I like to make this stupidity obvious.
To be fair there is no set format by the mods regarding commentary for specific players. Sometimes it's considered inappropriate to bump an old thread on a forum, there's a term for it - gravedigging.

I think most people can look at the first page of the forum and in my opinion if there's no immediate discussion, it's fine to create a new one. It encourages activity and traffic for the website, as the 'forum' format is quite antiquated itself plus threads can be merged if required.

tl;dr: have your say however you want (within the forum rules) otherwise this website will slowly fade away, also the arbitrary moralising can be off putting at times.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

  • Jethro
    Star Trekkin' across the universe

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
1 1 0 38 4
2 2 0 16 4
1 1 0 36 2
1 1 0 30 2
1 1 0 22 2
1 1 0 8 2
1 1 0 6 2
1 1 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 2
1 0 1 -2 0
1 0 1 -6 0
1 0 1 -8 0
2 0 2 -16 0
1 0 1 -22 0
1 0 1 -30 0
1 0 1 -36 0
1 0 1 -38 0
Back
Top Bottom