susan said:Agree with Alphie to an extent but the comparison is not applicable here as the lunatics at Penrith kept missing the eight. Our so called lunatics are one of the most professional and successful groups in the history of professional sport in this country.
In my opinion giving an extra 100k + per year to Glen as a reward for his services and to fortify the playing group who have done us proud for so long is simply common sense.
Hiku is a good player who has filled in well. For some reason he is being talked of like he is Graham Eadie on this site.If the Dogs offer him 300k so be it.Might be the right money, may not.Wolf is also nearing the end after great service,as is Kingy.I can guarantee you the retention of those 3 wont be the make or break of this club while losing Glen may well put us behind the eight ball for quite a while. Foran is a superstar- it is crazy to risk our future by denying Glen a payday.
bones said:I'm sure the players are just putting it out there so that it puts more pressure on the club to do all they can to keep Glenn.
Do we really want Glenn, Brett, Matai, Lyon, Ballin, King and Watmough all retiring at once in few years time? Would the team be able to handle so many leaving at once?
IMO, they need to be phased out 1 or 2 at time. I just wish it wasn't Glenn first. I'm not going to disrespect any of the players by saying who I think should go first (I wish we could keep them all), but how is the club supposed to decide who goes first? Is Glenn just the unlucky one because his contract expires first?
Get a grip folks, this thread is really turning weird nowAv8r said:Maybe Technical Coach is right
Brissie Kid said:Unlike any other backrower in the NRL G Stewart is a ball player. He is worth the extra money even if he can only run on one leg for 3 years. His leadership and toughness in defence are icing on the cake.
In the prelim final last year he dealt with S Burgess right at the start and got Manly back into the game when he set up the first try from a short kick for Snake. No other forward in the game except maybe SBW offers what Gift does.
mike walker said:g'day all,Lets be honest the reason why we had to get back into the game was because of a couple of glaring errors by glen.Personally I think his form over the last couple of seasons has on the whole been pretty ordinary and he is no longer the player he was and we have several younger players ready to step up,remember Tommy S carving up the right hand side for the first few rounds last year.None of this diminishes the fact Glen has been a wonderful player and clubman for us for many years but as I said in another thread if the great Menzies had to go no one is immune or irreplaceable.
cheers mike
the mauler said:mike walker said:g'day all,Lets be honest the reason why we had to get back into the game was because of a couple of glaring errors by glen.Personally I think his form over the last couple of seasons has on the whole been pretty ordinary and he is no longer the player he was and we have several younger players ready to step up,remember Tommy S carving up the right hand side for the first few rounds last year.None of this diminishes the fact Glen has been a wonderful player and clubman for us for many years but as I said in another thread if the great Menzies had to go no one is immune or irreplaceable.
cheers mike
So Mike, you believe Tom Symonds can replace Gift?? Lol.. Please!!!
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |