Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

sorry couldnt help myself

lasvegas

Reserve Grader
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
898
Reaction score
5
be honest......................... would everyone be as happy with monas game if easts won as they probably should have,considering his chip kick to no one turned the game back to easts in the last 10 min.

please be honest and not look from under monas coloured glasses.

i promise this is my last thread on monas :bdh:
 

byso

First Grader
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
141
Still would have had a good game. His general kicking improved out of site!.

Its a team effort remember
 

CC_Eagle

Reserve Grader
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
695
Reaction score
1
Not mentioning the 3 or 4 perfectly weighted kicks in their ingoal that resulted in Manly posession.
 

Matabele

Journey Man
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,082
Reaction score
530
be honest......................... would everyone be as happy with monas game if easts won as they probably should have,considering his chip kick to no one turned the game back to easts in the last 10 min.
You're right. That was a terrible kick of the highest proportions. Considering the success we'd had kicking long I can't for the life of me figure out what he was trying to achieve!

Brain explosion?
 

Matabele

Journey Man
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,082
Reaction score
530
It was up there with the Mullane "chip kick" seen at Bruce Stadium this time last year.
 

Ryan

Journey Man
Joined
Jul 16, 2004
Messages
19,587
Reaction score
17,830
A fair game. I for one can't see how he out did Kennedy or Beaver for MOM though.
 

Canteen Worker

First Grader
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
13,239
Reaction score
214
I thought Dunley was one of our best though the missed tackles were a worry!
 

ChuckWood

Reserve Grader
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
463
Reaction score
5
Apart from Kennedy , I thought Sam Harris & Williamson were outstanding.
 

Staff online

Team P W L PD Pts
15 13 2 344 26
15 13 2 311 26
14 11 3 105 24
14 11 3 176 22
14 9 5 122 20
13 7 6 33 16
15 7 8 -11 14
14 6 8 -44 14
14 6 8 -121 14
14 5 9 -66 12
14 5 9 -70 12
15 6 9 -131 12
14 5 9 -62 10
15 5 10 -132 10
13 2 11 -204 6
15 3 12 -250 6
Top Bottom