Historically we usually have a ranga in the side. Unfortunately we punted Symonds. Dylan Napa would fit the bill.Ranga and a bloody good prop.Yep, it's a brilliant strategy and they'd also know that next season there are plenty of guns off contract so if no one perfect comes through we'll have plenty in the bank. Our pack doesn't need someone like Packer, we've already begun building for the future with young and reasonably young players in Jamil Hopoate, Sironen, Paseka, AFB, Jake Trbo and Lussick either starting or continuing to develop. We don't need too many experienced players and certainly not of Packers type, id accept James Graham as he can lay a platform for the future pack to build off. Personally as I've stated in a different thread, I would like to try take Napa or JWH from the Rorters should they sign woods and/or Tedesco
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 74 | 22 |
2 | Raiders | 13 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 72 | 20 |
3 | Warriors | 12 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 20 |
4 | Storm | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 147 | 18 |
5 | Sharks | 12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 44 | 16 |
6 | Cowboys | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | -28 | 15 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 42 | 14 |
8 | Dragons | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 14 |
9 | Roosters | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | -22 | 14 |
10 | Rabbitohs | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | -58 | 14 |
11 | Dolphins | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 42 | 12 |
12 | Broncos | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 12 |
13 | Tigers | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | -58 | 12 |
14 | Knights | 13 | 5 | 0 | 8 | -65 | 12 |
15 | Panthers | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | -13 | 11 |
16 | Eels | 12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | -87 | 10 |
17 | Titans | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8 | -112 | 10 |