Cross-Forum-Discussion Round 23 2023 Cross Forum Chat

[HK_Eagle]

Trel needs to listen to his inner voice when playing… it was telling him, “don’t take the drop out”, but he didn’t listen.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

Sharkies seem pretty up for this but Souths been horrible too

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

They dont even care to challenge a clear knock back. Mentally cooked.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

Your going bad when you nearly let 2023 Wade Graham score

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

Hopefully the Sharks blow Souths away in the second half to show JD is a fraud.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

I like Munro.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

No penalty despite the six again being awarded just before the knock on?

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

You love to see Souths down, but hate to see Sharks up

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

I've brought up Cook forward passes 3 times today? Please show me.

Edit: Did it for you. Clearly you are still a touch upset.

View attachment 23348

My bad. Thought it was you. It was someone today in the broncos cowboys thread. Constant whinging.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

That step on Trell was glorious.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

LOLtrell mit

Trell-O-Vision? More like Smell-O-Vision

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

No penalty despite the six again being awarded just before the knock on?

It wasn't a 10m 6 again that is why. Like it has been ruled for 5 years. Anyway....

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

Why wasn't that a penalty?

Souffs knocked on in the same play a 6 again was given. Ive only seen that "rule" applied to the broncos, twice. Never seen it applied ever, in any other game... weird that a one off rule or crackdown would apply to the broncos and no one else. Sure it's never happened before (carrigan, haas, staggs, etc etc etc etc etc say hello)

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

That effort made late career darius look elite

Darius would fall over, though.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

Why wasn't that a penalty?

Souffs knocked on in the same play a 6 again was given. Ive only seen that "rule" applied to the broncos, twice. Never seen it applied ever, in any other game... weird that a one off rule or crackdown would apply to the broncos and no one else. Sure it's never happened before (carrigan, haas, staggs, etc etc etc etc etc say hello)

It wasn't a 10m penalty.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

It wasn't a 10m 6 again that is why. Like it has been ruled for 5 years. Anyway....

That's not the criteria hahahahahaha you've literally just applied a circumstance that suits your agenda

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

That's not the criteria hahahahahaha you've literally just applied a circumstance that suits your agenda

Bull****. If there is a knock on in the same play that a 6 again is called then there is a penalty. If it is a slow ruck and a knock on occurs after said slow ruck it is a knock on. Every single ****i g time it is ruled this way. Learn the rules.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

It wasn't a 10m 6 again that is why. Like it has been ruled for 5 years. Anyway....

So if it's not worthy of a penalty then why is it a six again? Because they introduced it as a replacement.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

So if it's not worthy of a penalty then why is it a six again? Because they introduced it as a replacement.

What? Every single infringement from the 40m onwards is a 6 again. I dont know what you are getting at.

 

[BroncosHQ.com]

Bull****. If there is a knock on in the same play that a 6 again for offside is called then there is a penalty. If it is a slow ruck and a knock on occurs after said slow ruck it is a knock on. Every single ****ing time it is ruled this way. Learn the rules.

The 6 again REPLACED the penalty. So if it's not a 6 again it is not a penalty. Why the **** would it matter if it was a ruck or 10 metre infringement? Use your brain and learn the rules....