Roosters reward for developing players proposal
- Thread starter DUFFMAN
- Start date
Meanwhile Ròosters lobby the Nrl to lower the age of 1st grade qualification to 13 years and 6 months ...
Being a 9 handy capper and doing part of your pre-season on the Golf Course is par for the course at Easts..lol.
Terry Zarsoff
First Grader
Ramy Haidar. Must admit, not on my radar and now certainly under the radar as far as Des is concerned.😉
I mean I would never have imagined that the post-Superleague Roosters (with the likes of Gyngell and Bouris on board) would ever have tried to game the system, to benefit themselves.
I mean I would never have imagined that the post-Superleague Roosters (with the likes of Gyngell and Bouris on board) would ever have tried to game the system, to benefit themselves.
Last edited:
Terry Zarsoff
First Grader
That old?
^^^ This , 150% this !!
Buying the very best juniors , then debuting them , then getting a salary cap exemption.
**** me I’ve heard it all!!
pt73
Bencher
More likely debut them, grab the exemption then send them back to NSW Cup or do what they did to Flanagan.
I do admire the Chooks, they have developed some top players in recent years. Sonny Bill, Angus Crichton, Cooper Cronk, Maloney, Tedesco, Jennings, the list goes on.
I hear they are keen to develop Payne Haas too. That sort of commitment to youth should be rewarded. It's only fair!
HoldenV8
Journey Man
IMO a debutant player should had to have spent at least 5 years in the clubs junior system to be eligible.
Otherwise this scheme basically rewards a club like the Chooks who buy a talented and already mostly developed 17 or 18 year old (e.g. Sam Walker, Joseph Suaalii) and then put them in first grade by the time they hit 18 or 19. That's not developing those players themselves in their junior system. That's profiting off of the work other clubs have done.
Interesting to note that the main ones online (social media) I have seen defending this proposed new scheme? Chooks fans.....
Otherwise this scheme basically rewards a club like the Chooks who buy a talented and already mostly developed 17 or 18 year old (e.g. Sam Walker, Joseph Suaalii) and then put them in first grade by the time they hit 18 or 19. That's not developing those players themselves in their junior system. That's profiting off of the work other clubs have done.
Interesting to note that the main ones online (social media) I have seen defending this proposed new scheme? Chooks fans.....
you forgot the famous roosters twin juniors- the morris boys
Last edited:
The only salary cap reward can be a proportiant discount relevant to when the player was introduced to the Club. Key entry levels are, Matthews Cup, SG Ball and Flegg as the discounts. Exemptions would be is, if a player who entered the system at Flegg level but had played junior footy from either U16's or U18's in the Club's district would receive the same discount as Matts & Ball. Why not reward reward Clubs with discounts as high as 30% for a player starting off with Matts, 20% from Ball and say 15% from Flegg.
Maybe this is what a Club like Wests Tigers needs as this would give them more cap $$$ to purchase a marquis player to bring it all together.
While we are at it, some of this Cap money should go back to players junior Club. ie Wests signed up Feledy from Manly's Ball Cup side. Wests could earn a cap discount as Feledy will attract a discount as he came through their Flegg team but Manly should earn a Cap discount as a "payment" or "reward" for developing him for the past 4 years, possibly the balance of the original max level of 30% which would be 15% of his future contracts.
You may think I haven't thought this through and you may be correct.
Maybe this is what a Club like Wests Tigers needs as this would give them more cap $$$ to purchase a marquis player to bring it all together.
While we are at it, some of this Cap money should go back to players junior Club. ie Wests signed up Feledy from Manly's Ball Cup side. Wests could earn a cap discount as Feledy will attract a discount as he came through their Flegg team but Manly should earn a Cap discount as a "payment" or "reward" for developing him for the past 4 years, possibly the balance of the original max level of 30% which would be 15% of his future contracts.
You may think I haven't thought this through and you may be correct.
HoldenV8
Journey Man
That's basically the size of it.
QueefRichards
Bencher
Isn't he still working for Des?
MadMarcus
Toovey for NRL CEO
the Dolphins might struggle next year without a coach…
The chooks raid other clubs juniors, yes
But this policy is open for all clubs that wish to invest in the structure that allows it. I hate salary rorting but in this situation, it seems the playing field is even , they just do it better. Listening to robinson on 360 the other day was great and his concept was considering the playmaking talent that they have and will need to upgrade like walker, developing forwards from within is on the menu
But this policy is open for all clubs that wish to invest in the structure that allows it. I hate salary rorting but in this situation, it seems the playing field is even , they just do it better. Listening to robinson on 360 the other day was great and his concept was considering the playmaking talent that they have and will need to upgrade like walker, developing forwards from within is on the menu
Last edited:
Shoe1
Journey Man
They should have thought of that. They will need to go back to DCE’s dad.
Users who are viewing this thread
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
