There’s been a trend, and it’s not just a recent thing either, to blatantly concede penalties when a team is defending its own goal line. The reasoning behind this is it gives the defense a little time to reset and steady, effectively giving away a penalty and a tackle or two as a trade off for having a set line and defensive pattern. Well... at least I think that’s what it is anyhow!
Now through careful, scientific and in-depth research (let’s call it “compelling, but not legally conclusive evidence” that I just made up) I’ve come to the conclusion that these penalties account for roughly 1 in 5 of the penalties that our dear referees blow with child like glee and an enthusiasm that can only be attributed to the finest cocaine the NRL can source... or perhaps because they feel the need to be more than just a supposedly impartial adjudicator and know that they can influence a game to a far greater extent than any mere player!!*
Forgive me, in my homicidal dislike for MY GAME TODD, NOT YOURS YOU EGOTISTICAL TWAT.. I’ve stumbled away from my point.
Oh.. ok so I’ve totally and utterly guesstimated my 1/5 (or 20% if you like!) of penalties being deliberately conceded to gain a small but tangible benefit to the defending team inside their own 10 meters.
Perhaps there’s a need to penalize the defenders more harshly? In spirit, it’s a professional foul. So either march the players involved for a spell, or perhaps give the attacking team 1 point and fresh set of six as well, with the option to give Toddy a noogy as well? I reckon that may pull them up reasonably quickly?
Anyhow... after 11ty beers and at 230am, this makes near perfect sense. Instantly drop an estimated 20% of penalties in any given game. I’m sure there’s a flaw in this logic somewhere, but I’ll happily fight Greensprog over it.
So with 20% of penalties per game now gone, we can get the average per game down to somewhere around 20-25 per game..
Or something..