Re-cast your votes for survivor

[Dan]

I have removed all votes for kane Cleal and have also removed any player who has not played 3 games. You can only vote for a player who played NRL this week!

 

[Kiwi Eagle]

Kane played NRL,so should be in the running IMO. I thought that was the point of it to be honest

 

[Dan]

kiwi, how can you show consistency accross 1 game?

The rules are

- Must have played 3 NRL games this year.
- Must have played that week

then you can vote for who you want

 

[Fluffy]

So that leaves us with Kane to play 2 more games, 1 crap and one on fire.

He cant get any votes for game 2 either.

Game 3 is his 3rd and final for the year. He plays too well to get voted off.

after 3 games he is the winner.

What about those who were voted off in weeks 1 and 2 as well

 

[Dan]

Fluffy either deal with my rules for survivor or dont ****ing play!.

I am sik of all the ****ing whinging. It is a simple concept if you dont like it then dont ****ing play it. Hoestly the way some of you carry on about these rules you would htink its rocket science.

I highly doubt Cleal will make many more appearances this year, and I am sure he wont have a blinder and win.

I believe the winner will be BK, BEaver, Watmough or Stewart.

 

[Kiwi Eagle]

kiwi, how can you show consistency accross 1 game?

The rules are

- Must have played 3 NRL games this year.
- Must have played that week

then you can vote for who you want

Fair enough,I can't understand what all the hassle was,seemed simple enough to me,the worst player that week was gone.

I liked the original concept better though to be honest