Probably the best time for it........

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Blunty, Sep 4, 2005.



Share This Page

  1. Blunty

    By:BluntySep 4, 2005
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    We've made the semis for the first time in 8 years, I think that is reason enough to chuck down the team you think should be selected for next week.

    1. Stewart
    2. Stephenson
    3. Alberts
    4. Hill
    5. Hicks (if injured Matai in side, please no Donald)
    6. Witt (Will be targeted in defense, but otherwise Monaghan will have too much pressure on him)
    7. Monaghan
    8. Heckenburg
    9. Williamson
    10. King
    11. Menzies
    12. Watmough
    13. Kennedy

    14. Leuluai
    15. Dunley
    16. Harris
    17. Kite (feel as if he really came into his own off the bench, missed the early on hard stuff and dominated later)

    18. Bryant (unfortunately misses out, but any injury in any position and he'll slot in.)
     
  2. Canteen Worker

    By:Canteen WorkerSep 4, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    13,244
    Likes Received:
    187
    Likes Given:
    100
    Ratings:
    +215 /5
    We will be much stronger with Beaver back in the back row. Witt is too much like Monaghan but I would pick him as well. No surprise that I would start with Kite and leave King out for Bryant.
     
  3. Crushercleal

    By:CrusherclealSep 4, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    1. Stewart
    2. Steppa
    3. Matai
    4. Alberts (Tezza too slow, will be massacred by Tahu and B Smith)
    5. Hicks
    6. Witt (need his g-kicking and simply can't have a forward at 5/8)
    7. Monas
    8. Kite
    9. Dunley/Willo
    10. Hecks
    11. Choc
    12. Beaver
    13. BK

    14. Harris 15. Dunley/Willo 16. Lulu 17. Bryant

    No King, Donald or Randall (simply not good enough for 1st grade)

    Any thoughts?
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top