[poll] Terry Hill Poll

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.

How Successful has the ploy to sign Terry Hill been in 2005?

  • Brilliant. We would not have made the semis without him.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Reasonably good. He has helped the junior players to make the grade

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Moderately successful. He has been okay when on the field.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pretty woeful - he is slow and fat

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total waste and he has stopped others from getting experience and game time.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
I have a gut feeling that another option could be:

"Bad - he has been a poor off-field presence".
 
Tezza was signed to ad depth and some experiance to the back line, add a bit of attitude and mongrel. He has done all that , i am more than satisfied with his contribution this year especially when taking into account the relatively small price we have paid for him.
 
i might ad that alkl this media focus on him would also have to be intentional, id rather the media hound him than a lot of the young blokes like Stewey etc, also takes the pressure of Monaghs , we all know how well he handles that!
 
There is a saying that goes along the lines "that the quality of the product remains long after you have paid for the item"

We got Terry for a bargain and generally that is how he has performed. He has done his best, but his best sadly has not been up to anything near NRL standard, except sledging then he is still a hands down champion.
 
Team P W L PD Pts
5 4 1 23 10
5 4 1 14 10
6 4 2 48 8
6 4 2 28 8
5 3 2 25 8
5 3 2 14 8
6 3 2 38 7
6 3 2 21 7
6 3 3 37 6
6 3 3 16 6
6 3 3 -13 6
5 2 3 -15 6
6 3 3 -36 6
6 2 4 -5 4
6 2 4 -7 4
5 0 5 -86 2
6 1 5 -102 2
Back
Top Bottom