SeaEagle9413
Forward Pass
I have heard countless times that Manly are after both Boyd Cordner and David Klemmer. Which one should we sign? Have your say in the latest poll!
Yeah I'm a bit doubtful also but not many other options for forwards in 2016 signings.I dont think we will get either of them to be honest. I dont see the Rorters or the dogs giving up these players, 3rd party contracts are we will be blown out of the water im afraid.
You are talking like a contract actually means something...Yeah I'm a bit doubtful also but not many other options for forwards in 2016 signings.
Tamou-I reckon he will be off to Canberra
Cordner-60/40 IMO with sbw coming back he may be pushed to the bench
Klemmer-Surley dogs won't let him go
Eastwood-Possible but I'm not overly keen on him
Jackson-Dogs won't let him go
Lane-we'd be luck to talk to him
Why, wouldn't the roosters have more money to resign himInteresting tweet from ex media man Neil Evans
@neilEvansmail NRL: And after the Pearce headlines 2day, also big mail emerging rep back-rower could be headed 2 the Northern Beaches! #Roosters
He mentioned after it being Cordner.
Why, wouldn't the roosters have more money to resign him
#thehayneplane won't be back anytime soonMaking room for #thehayneplane
Interesting tweet from ex media man Neil Evans
@neilEvansmail NRL: And after the Pearce headlines 2day, also big mail emerging rep back-rower could be headed 2 the Northern Beaches! #Roosters
He mentioned after it being Cordner.
Cordner is hardly "emerging". He played for both NSW and Australia in 2013.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
4 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
5 | Raiders | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 46 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 8 |
7 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
8 | Cowboys | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | -42 | 8 |
9 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
10 | Dolphins | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 6 |
11 | Sea Eagles | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 6 |
12 | Tigers | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 6 |
13 | Titans | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | -36 | 6 |
14 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -10 | 4 |