Please tell me why ...

[Budgie]

So no Kapow, no AFB on the weekend. Seriously thinking I need to change my footy comp pick from us to them.
Can anyone tell me why I should stick
With Manly?
Why will we win?
Anyone?

 

[SeaEagle9413]

loyalty shows character.

Inglis will be a big loss, and we have home ground advantage. Hopefully Jackson Hastings has a run.

Can't think of anything else.

 

[Disco]

Souths looked very ordinary....that is all I've got

 

[pjayz]

 

[Harvies elbow]

Cause zorba will pick them in the Manly Daily ??!!@@#@$#

 

[maxta]

Souths will be ordinary.....
Manly will still be better than them without these 2.
No Reynolds or Inglis is massive....IF we lost would be absolutely shocked.

 

[Ralphie]

I suspect souffs will try to play a power game in the middle third and will stay away from their backs due to the absence of Inglis & Reynolds (Note a little birdie told me that Reynolds may make a shock early comeback this weekend). This is what's known as a game plan, something we haven't used in a year or so.

If they do this we are stuffed, so I've got nothin..........

 

[tookey]

Because Trent said on Sunday that he can fix all the problems by this weeks game against souths

The dynamic Myles and brown will be back in the starting side this week taking looping passes from Api

If Trent can bring in the Wright brothers as well we are certainties for a win

 

[ricardo]

 

[ricardo]

Truth be told we will crush Souths and the team will unite for an early season fightback. Seriously what has Souffs got to be afraid of?

36-12 Manly victory

 

[PONTIAN SEA EAGLE]

They have the burgess boys which may be to strong for us.But then again tigers made them look ordinary.Manly by 6.

 

[Deleted member 26876]

If the attitude defencively goes throughout the whole squad than it doesn't matter who we play the pack, depleted or not, will rise for the challenge

 

[pjayz]

Looking at it logically, without our four best props and first choice forward back-up in Lane, we don't have much of a chance. Yes they are missing Inglis and Reynolds; however, Inglis doesn't have the impact he used to. Reynolds is a big loss, but our halves advantage is totally negated if we can't win the battle of the forwards.

One or two props out - yes, four props out plus no Lane as an option - I can't see us winning.

 

[Ryan]

Looking at it logically, without our four best props and first choice forward back-up in Lane, we don't have much of a chance. Yes they are missing Inglis and Reynolds; however, Inglis doesn't have the impact he used to. Reynolds is a big loss, but our halves advantage is totally negated if we can't win the battle of the forwards.

One or two props out - yes, four props out plus no Lane as an option - I can't see us winning.

X Lane might play (and removed from injury list).
X Kennedy is MUCH, MUCH better than people realise.
X Backline is in tact
X Losing Perrett? He wasn't a factor at all last weekend.
X Great game for Myles to make a stand (starting again).

We'll win this guys.

 

[ManlyTragic]

They have no Inglis and no Reynolds, but we have Myles, Api and Brown ......pretty even really!

 

[tookey]

Only Sam Burgess is playing this week

 

[nightster]

they have Farrah

 

[Mitch]

Reynolds is in jumper 21 on an extended bench. I wouldn't be so sure he doesn't play.

 

[nightster]

Imbeciles ... what ! imbeciles? .... why I resemble that remark ! from jabba the cretin

 

[pjayz]

X Lane might play (and removed from injury list).
X Kennedy is MUCH, MUCH better than people realise.
X Backline is in tact
X Losing Perrett? He wasn't a factor at all last weekend.
X Great game for Myles to make a stand (starting again).

We'll win this guys.

I certainly hope you are right and Lane returning is a plus; however, we are down four props and the replacements are backrowers. We better run them ragged and burn them out if we are to win.