Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Frogz, Aug 13, 2014.
Has anyone been listening to NRL 360 tonight...Paul Kent is a d1ckhead, I thought he was ok
You thought Kunt was ok??? Lol!!!
He's out of the same mould as Weedler,Rothfool, Balloon head and the rest.
I gave him benefit of the doubt....sorry guys
Kent is speaking as a purist. On one hand he says you can not determine intent in a charge. Then he states that Starlo knew he was going to crush Keary :huh: Paulo's charge on White has been downgraded to #1. So Kent was wrong about that tackle too
Kent = News limited filth = hates Manly
Surely Balloon head must be from a separate mould?
He now compares State of Origin 2 by beating my kitchen rules ONCE, The game must be good....He then complains of having to wait 15 minutes to have a pee at Brookvale Oval....should of tried the Men's Paul, u can still sit down in them
Yes have to be. No one can have such a huge head and such skinny shoulders. I reckon the mould was run over before being poured and it squashed the shoulders part while expanding the head part. Just mutant. The rothfool mould was poured using a bourbon barrell and the Weedler mould was just bashed with a silly stick.
Finally he says, in evidence of his claim that Dave Smith is a great CEO.....of course he is, he has bought touch footy and that's played by women....so the game must be going great....sorry Kent u r a dope
Kent bagged Brookie, so he is a dick lol. Starlo didn't mean that tackle, things just happen in the game by accident.
I reckon Kent and Weidler were separated at birth. They both really struggle to find anything positive to report about league. Apparently I'm lucky I don't have to put up with Rothfield as well?
Poor Kent, wouldnt know. Didnt play enough to find out.
Yeah him and Ben Ikin give me the irrits more often than not. Of course a serious crusher tackle is more dangerous than a modest trip. Starlo's wasn't even a crusher tackle in my view; and in the next breath they're saying Reynolds trip was a bad one. They are contradicting and tripping themselves up with thinly-veiled bias against Manly (and Brookie it seems). I sincerely hope if he's dumb enough to front up there (for the Riff game) more than a few of you devotees at Brookie say "G'Day" to the silver-haired sook!
I don't understand why Paul Kent doesn't get punched out more often.
I like Paul Kent.....a lot......he's one of the few people in this world that I am taller than! But he knows next to nothing about Rugby League.
agree with @RiverEagle ... they didnt discuss or show footage of chicken wing on Matai, but instead talked about Starling showing intent in crusher tackle which was overturned.... Replay of the job they did on Matai looks like it belongs in a MMA highlight reel
Exactly EB. Was a dead-set arm bar (MMA and UFC style). And several times worse than both of Starlo's " infringements" put together.
What do you think rates higher? Analysis of a clear chicken wing from a souths player on one of the most hated / feared players in the comp? Or a chance to beat up on a Manly player?
I think we all know the answer to that one Isz. Unfortunately. But let the haters hate and we can then ram the trophy up their bot bots.