pathetic effort

[The Indian]

Gotta say Wolf's defence has gone from shaky to downright awful of late. Dunno whether he has lost confidence in his shoulder and neck but he just arm grabs and comes up with some horrendous misses.

We have too many injuries to make sackings but he needs a spell in the reggies for mine.

Hes not the only bloke going bad ..... but his defence is nowhere near standard at moment. With everything else going on we just cant carry him at the moment.

 

[COMMANDER]

No excuse for making a pack like Parra look good.

None.

Your unedited description of the Parramatta team could be deemed offensive to disabled people. Please refrain from using that description. Thank-you.

 

[Kiwi Eagle]

Perspective Ryan, perspective

maybe it is my age but the carry on after we lose a game (the way players are talked about etc) just seems over the top

Constructive criticism yes - "they were not trying" no

Bingo

 

[Ian Martin tragic]

King: 16 runs for 130; 27 tackles
Kite: 8 runs for 63; 29 tackles
Mauro: 5 runs for 43; 25 tackles
Lussick: 4 runs for 36; 16 tackles
Joe G: 3 runs for 22; 9 tackles
Chok: 12 runs for 99; 35 tackles

I love stats like the next bloke but how many minutes each plays compared to whether we have the ball or not times makes a big diff

King: 16 runs for 130; 27 tackles (53 mins)
Kite: 8 runs for 63; 29 tackles (36 mins)
Mauro: 5 runs for 43; 25 tackles (37mins)
Lussick: 4 runs for 36; 16 tackles (40 mins)
Joe G: 3 runs for 22; 9 tackles (15 mins)
Chok: 12 runs for 99; 43 tackles (80 mins) {correction on the tackles, from the smh site)

 

[EagleRock40]

King: 16 runs for 130; 27 tackles
Kite: 8 runs for 63; 29 tackles
Mauro: 5 runs for 43; 25 tackles
Lussick: 4 runs for 36; 16 tackles
Joe G: 3 runs for 22; 9 tackles
Chok: 12 runs for 99; 35 tackles

I love stats like the next bloke but how many minutes each plays compared to whether we have the ball or not times makes a big diff

King: 16 runs for 130; 27 tackles (53 mins)
Kite: 8 runs for 63; 29 tackles (36 mins)
Mauro: 5 runs for 43; 25 tackles (37mins)
Lussick: 4 runs for 36; 16 tackles (40 mins)
Joe G: 3 runs for 22; 9 tackles (15 mins)
Chok: 12 runs for 99; 43 tackles (80 mins) {correction on the tackles, from the smh site)

Kite, Mauro & Lussick - theres our problem!

 

[Jethro]

King: 16 runs for 130; 27 tackles
Kite: 8 runs for 63; 29 tackles
Mauro: 5 runs for 43; 25 tackles
Lussick: 4 runs for 36; 16 tackles
Joe G: 3 runs for 22; 9 tackles
Chok: 12 runs for 99; 35 tackles

I love stats like the next bloke but how many minutes each plays compared to whether we have the ball or not times makes a big diff

King: 16 runs for 130; 27 tackles (53 mins)
Kite: 8 runs for 63; 29 tackles (36 mins)
Mauro: 5 runs for 43; 25 tackles (37mins)
Lussick: 4 runs for 36; 16 tackles (40 mins)
Joe G: 3 runs for 22; 9 tackles (15 mins)
Chok: 12 runs for 99; 43 tackles (80 mins) {correction on the tackles, from the smh site)

Kite, Mauro & Lussick - theres our problem!

That depends on what area you are looking at. Based on those figures provided by Ian Martin tragic, per minute averages (rounded to 2 decimal points) are:

King: 0.30 runs for 2.45; 0.51 tackles
Kite: 0.22 runs for 1.75; 0.81 tackles
Mauro: 0.14 runs for 1.16; 0.68 tackles
Lussick: 0.10 runs for 0.90; 0.40 tackles
Joe G: 0.20 runs for 1.47; 0.60 tackles
Choc: 0.15 runs for 1.24; 0.54 tackles

 

[mozgrame]

The Eels were fired up and ready to prove a point to their disgraceful fans, the bookies who wrote them off, the media that was all abuzz about them and their tired old plodder Hindy (who i thought went good for the slimy pricks again). They would have pushed a lot of sides. We are pretty much busted at the moment through injury, suspension and travel and still didn't shame ourselves.

 

[Jerry1]

Guys - this was the Eels - not Melbourne or Brisbane.
Better teams would have put 50 on us.

Looking for a turnaround at Brookie.

13th spot aint good