our 2nd half

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by sharx, Mar 19, 2006.



Share This Page

  1. sharx

    By:sharxMar 19, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    6
    Ratings:
    +1 /0
    9 miss tackles(21 in the first half)
    only 39% possession
    70% in our half
    6-0 penalty count against us
    1 sin bin
    they lose the ball,its a penalty
    we lose it,its a knock on
    we out score them 12-4
     
  2. Matabele

    By:MatabeleMar 19, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    yeah, there were some hopeful signs, especially in defense.
     
  3. Ryan

    By:RyanMar 19, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    17,542
    Likes Received:
    4,302
    Likes Given:
    719
    Ratings:
    +12,574 /547
    The problem was though, is that we HAD to pull together, or another flogging was on the board. I just can't get around that that's a GOOD thing. We are second last lads, and our performance warrants it.
     
  4. Nutzcraw

    By:NutzcrawMar 19, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    4
    Likes Given:
    12
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    Too hard on them again mate!!

    The end scenario is we played crappy in attack and had to make a ****load of tackles.. we rarely had the ball in their half... rarely had the ball fullstop and if stewarts kick stays in we got to 20 all .. with a chance at snatching a victory!!

    Not a bad effort considering we are playing the favourites for the competition in their first home game of the year.. we had to make arguably the hardest trek in the game and we just about got over the top of them with no ball!!
     
  5. Ryan

    By:RyanMar 19, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    17,542
    Likes Received:
    4,302
    Likes Given:
    719
    Ratings:
    +12,574 /547
    Game = 80 minutes. That 1st 40 minutes, and espects of the second 40 was plain 2004, and appaulling. At least Peter Sharp has some balance to his sides !!! He introduced new players (albeit hacks) at times to attempt to improve change things.
     
  6. Jatz Crackers

    By:Jatz CrackersMar 19, 2006
    Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2005
    Messages:
    9,342
    Likes Received:
    1,213
    Likes Given:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1,641 /10
    I think referring to Sharp & Dessie in that way Ryan is out of line.

    I think Hasler has done more than Sharp and done it better than Sharp & the results achieved under Hasler are better than Sharp.

    Hasler may still be doing some things wrong, like King & Ballin etc, but placing a favourable comparison on Sharp is to my mind plain wrong.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top