NRL to control Lottoland for finals

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.

Eagles Nest 78

Reserve Grader
All bit of a NRL spin …

NRL to control Lottoland for finals

https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/nrl-to...r-finals/972b13b7-15bf-451a-8466-5ec9862007e3
By AAP

Manly looks set to be given the all-clear to host a finals game at Lottoland despite the breakdown in security that marred their recent NRL game with Melbourne.

An altercation between a fan and Storm star Will Chambers, as the centre was leaving the field, sparked concerns over Lottoland's ability to host a finals game.

While the fan wasn't charged by police, the NRL integrity unit is yet to finalise its investigation, which could include his banishment from the game.

The incident prompted NRL boss Todd Greenberg to threaten to strip the venue of its finals hosting rights unless improvements were made to security.

However NRL head of football Graham Annesley on Monday confirmed that, as official hirers of finals venues, all responsibilities were on the governing body.

Should the Sea Eagles finish fifth, they will host an elimination final next week.

"We have to see obviously what happens next weekend before we determine which clubs are likely to host in week one of the finals," Annesley said.

"Brookvale is definitely a possibility.

"But when we get to finals, regardless of the fact that they're a home final, they're not controlled by the club. They're actually controlled by the NRL.

"We're the hirer of the venue, we're responsible for everything that happens at that match, which includes security."

Annesley is adamant the problem wasn't a failure of infrastructure, which includes a retractable tunnel being used as players head to the dressing sheds.

However it was merely a case of being more stringent with the protocols being tightened for when players leave the field after being sin binned.

"There's a cage there, as everyone knows, that slides down and effectively cuts the tunnel off, or the gateway off from the general public," he said.

"Because it was a sin bin and it wasn't a start of the game, second half, halftime or fulltime, it wasn't closed entirely.

"But when it comes to a finals game, we'll be in control of all of those matters and we wouldn't expect to see a repeat of that."

Annesley said the integrity unit was still liaising with police over the matter, but suggested the fan would be banned from the game.

"It's obviously unacceptable. It's not something we want to see at any of our games," he said.

"People are fully entitled to go to our games and say and do whatever they want, as long as they stay in a position where they need to be, and don't go anywhere near any of the players or officials in an aggressive type of way.

"So that'll be dealt with over the next few days, but I would suggest to you that it might be a while before that particular person is back at another NRL game."
 
As an aside the NRL run the semi’s anyway.

The only value the club will get from the event would be merchandise sales, and I think hospitality.

Ticket revenue goes to the NRL.
 
They're actually controlled by the NRL. "We're the hirer of the venue, we're responsible for everything that happens at that match, which includes security."
Oh good, the NRL in control. Nothing could go wrong, then...!!!
giphy.gif
 
The bloke acted a bit of a goose but he didnt actually commit a crime & was released without charge.

Channel 9 showed multiple Facebook pictures of him & actually named him on their Sunday night edition.

Surely he could take some sort of legal action against them for releasing his name?

If the NRL must punish him, perhaps a stern letter as it's obviously not his go - with no carryover points he should only have to sit 1 game out & he'll be back in time for the home semi.
 
NRL head of football Graham Annesley on Monday confirmed that, as official hirers of finals venues, all responsibilities were on the governing body.
Should the Sea Eagles finish fifth, they will host an elimination final next week.
“We have to see obviously what happens next weekend before we determine which clubs are likely to host in week one of the finals,” Annesley said.

Annesley is adamant the problem wasn’t a failure of infrastructure, which includes a retractable tunnel being used as players head to the dressing sheds.
However it was merely a case of being more stringent with the protocols being tightened for when players leave the field after being sin binned.


- As was always the case. Todd got involved because he has an intense dislike of Manly, I know fans of most clubs say that about the ceo, but there's a long history of incidents and retributions led by this person.

We know the tv stations don't like smaller venues because it costs them more to set up there equipment (forget the fact crowds are better at smaller stadiums) and so emboldened by that Todd can #nottalkthegameup by threatening a team and it's fans based on his continued agenda and dislike of Manly. The club was never going to lose a hosting right over that incident but it makes good headlines and sabre-rattling for Todd to yet again jump all over Manly.

I remember the purple faced outrage when a newspaper published a photo of a man with "suspected terror links" wearing a Canterbury jersey. Todd went off about how isolated incidents shouldn't besmirch clubs and how irresponsible and unfair it was to clubs when stories are twisted this way.

And yet........
 
NRL head of football Graham Annesley on Monday confirmed that, as official hirers of finals venues, all responsibilities were on the governing body.
Should the Sea Eagles finish fifth, they will host an elimination final next week.
“We have to see obviously what happens next weekend before we determine which clubs are likely to host in week one of the finals,” Annesley said.

Annesley is adamant the problem wasn’t a failure of infrastructure, which includes a retractable tunnel being used as players head to the dressing sheds.
However it was merely a case of being more stringent with the protocols being tightened for when players leave the field after being sin binned.


- As was always the case. Todd got involved because he has an intense dislike of Manly, I know fans of most clubs say that about the ceo, but there's a long history of incidents and retributions led by this person.

We know the tv stations don't like smaller venues because it costs them more to set up there equipment (forget the fact crowds are better at smaller stadiums) and so emboldened by that Todd can #nottalkthegameup by threatening a team and it's fans based on his continued agenda and dislike of Manly. The club was never going to lose a hosting right over that incident but it makes good headlines and sabre-rattling for Todd to yet again jump all over Manly.

I remember the purple faced outrage when a newspaper published a photo of a man with "suspected terror links" wearing a Canterbury jersey. Todd went off about how isolated incidents shouldn't besmirch clubs and how irresponsible and unfair it was to clubs when stories are twisted this way.

And yet........

Just gives them something to cheer about

Screenshot_20190502-115035_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Is it true 2008 was the last time we actually hosted a home final?? Because in that case I was actually only 8 years old the last time it happened! No wonder I can hardly remember it lol!

I’m sooo pumped
I can hardly remember 2008 as well but not due to age!
 
Team P W L PD Pts
7 6 1 99 14
7 6 1 54 14
7 5 2 36 12
8 5 2 39 11
8 5 3 64 10
7 4 3 49 10
8 4 4 73 8
7 3 4 17 8
8 4 4 -14 8
8 4 4 -16 8
8 4 4 -60 8
8 3 4 17 7
8 3 5 -25 6
7 2 5 -55 6
8 3 5 -55 6
7 1 6 -87 4
7 1 6 -136 4
Back
Top Bottom