NRL to Cap Football Dept Spending

HappilyManly

Journey Man
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...g/news-story/b74896b210527d630a66c976de579e44

NRL aims for level playing field by capping football department spending
David Riccio Exclusive, The Sunday Telegraph

GOAL-kicking and wrestling coaches, nutritionists, statisticians and sports psychologists will fall under a new cap on football department spending, set to be ratified before the finals.

And for the first time The Sunday Telegraph can reveal the cap will sit between $6m and $7m.

A meeting next week between the NRL and a four-man working panel is set to formalise recommendations which will allow chief executive Todd Greenberg to take the new footy cap guidelines and rules to a meeting of club bosses next month.

The football department cap is considered the greatest equalisation measure for the competition since a salary cap for player payments was introduced in 1990.

The cap is designed to save financially stricken clubs from going broke or in the extreme, being forced by the NRL to relocate to Perth or become a second team in Brisbane.

The cap will focus purely on the amount of club spending outside of the player salary cap.

The NRL has previously declared the new football department cap isn’t about stymieing innovation.

However, the concern from the NRL is the gap is widening between the wealthiest clubs and those struggling financially. Some have the capacity to appoint at-times double the amount of experts in high-performance, specialist coaching and assistants to poorer clubs.

The new cap will include the salaries of every football staff member. Capital expenditure and centres of excellence won’t be included.

Over the past five years, spending on the football department and staffing — as clubs seek to gain an advantage — has exploded, blowing club budgets by a combined figure of almost $29 million.

Clubs that fail to work within the parameters of the new cap figure, which is expected to sit around $6m and $7m, will be required to pay a “luxury tax” where money will be pooled by the NRL and most likely drip-fed across clubs that don’t overspend.

The working panel which will meet the NRL next week includes club CEOs Justin Pascoe (Wests Tigers), Joe Kelly (Sydney Roosters), Greg Tonner (North Queensland) and David Donaghy (Melbourne).
 
And the penalty for being over the football department cap is what? Paying a naughty tax to the NRL....??

Hmm this may not work as an actual deterrent for wealthy clubs. Because if your a club with buckets of money why not just pay the naughty tax and then just continue on being naughty so to speak??

To me it depends on how much the tax actually is, to whether it will do anything.

And how do you even manage this? Trying to keep tabs on football dept staff for clubs like the donkey's would be pretty challenging. How many people wander in and out of their sports centre daily? Who is who, are they paid staff, 'friends', 'consultants', non paid work experience people lol, etc. What about that person that went to *Hunt's house with a sports science vitamin bag??

And even if the NRL say the money from the tax will go to lesser clubs, I am definitely not 100% confident that this would happen either.

*Edit - Hunt out of hypothetical scenario set in 2018 and Milford in. Thank you @cherry_poppins for editing my post....! ;-)
 
Last edited:
And the penalty for being over the football department cap is what? Paying a naughty tax to the NRL....??

Hmm this may not work as an actual deterrent for wealthy clubs. Because if your a club with buckets of money why not just pay the naughty tax and then just continue on being naughty so to speak??

To me it depends on how much the tax actually is, to whether it will do anything.

And how do you even manage this? Trying to keep tabs on football dept staff for clubs like the donkey's would be pretty challenging. How many people wander in and out of their sports centre daily? Who is who, are they paid staff, 'friends', 'consultants', non paid work experience people lol, etc. What about that person that went to Hunt's house with a sports science vitamin bag??

And even if the NRL say the money from the tax will go to lesser clubs, I am definitely not 100% confident that this would happen either.
Hunt has been signed by the dragons

You really dropped the ball there champ
 
And the penalty for being over the football department cap is what? Paying a naughty tax to the NRL....??

Hmm this may not work as an actual deterrent for wealthy clubs. Because if your a club with buckets of money why not just pay the naughty tax and then just continue on being naughty so to speak??

To me it depends on how much the tax actually is, to whether it will do anything.

And how do you even manage this? Trying to keep tabs on football dept staff for clubs like the donkey's would be pretty challenging. How many people wander in and out of their sports centre daily? Who is who, are they paid staff, 'friends', 'consultants', non paid work experience people lol, etc. What about that person that went to Hunt's house with a sports science vitamin bag??

And even if the NRL say the money from the tax will go to lesser clubs, I am definitely not 100% confident that this would happen either.
Yes watch for the 'consultants' or
Doctor Doolittle sponsored by.........
Physio sponsored by........
Kryo chamber courtesy of.........
Then that's IF they tell that much.
 
**** me, the Broncos invest that in brown paper bag company shares alone each year.

They are up **** creek without a paddle.

Lol.
Watch all tne monied Clubs have a surfe in Staff numbers in their Centers of Excellence departments 😎
 
"Capital expenditure and centres of excellence won’t be included."
Well there goes the level playing field right there.
Nevertheless the idea of a luxury tax is not so stupid, I think they use that in NBA (and maybe other top US sports) and if you want to go over the cap then do so but all the other clubs get a cut of the hefty tax you pay.
Certainly would at least encourage all spending to be open and above-board.
 
They are doing something...so ok but it reminds recently in California where they were in a drought so most of the households had no grass etc. A paper took a pic of the kardashian house and it's grounds were luscious green.

Kim said: "Oh we just pay the excess water fine or whatever."

So...it might make little difference to the rich clubs.

I hope never type or refer to that person or her crappy family again.
 
Couldn't the broncos just pay minimum wage to their staff and their staff could work for someone else part time who may be a member of the thoroughbreds who just happen to pay shedloads?
 
I've typed a couple of long winded rants about this but I'm cutting it down and just going to say

I'm not a fan of this.
It's a second salary cap that shouldn't even exist and for the NRL to police it, they can't even get it right with the first one.
 
As long as the richer clubs have the major say in the game, equity between clubs will remain unassailable. Consider Brisbane Broncs as an example. They service a city of over 2 million so they have exclusive option to attending supporters in that city. They get crowds that demonstrate that inequity which means they financially benefit more than others. They have the third biggest Australian city's options on the corporate dollar for TPAs. Cost of living in Brisbane is cheaper (eg rentals, buying properties, shorter travel times etc). They were NEWS LTD propped up for years. Now compare that with the West Tigers. To address this problem you really need a means of limiting the almost carte blanch offers these bigger clubs can make. The draft would be the most effective, but the League seems unwilling (for obvious reasons given who is in charge) to pursue this line again. Raise the salary cap and take TPAs out of the game, or at least limit them to a set number of companies and a maximum pay out by those companies.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Team P W L PD Pts
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Back
Top Bottom