1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

NRL Ladder, Round 1

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by fLIP, Mar 13, 2005.

  1. fLIP

    fLIP UFO Hunter

    Ratings:
    +901 /26
    <img src='http://www.alternateeagles.com/uploader/files/Round%201.bmp' alt='' style='vertical-align:middle; border:0' />
     
  2. KaZa

    KaZa Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +327 /22
    were in the top 8!!!!!!!

    hahahaha
     
  3. Volley

    Volley Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +784 /23
    How good does that look. A positive differential, haven't seen that in quite a while, this time last year being then.
     
  4. Dan

    Dan Kim Jong Dan Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

    33,379
    3,989
    Ratings:
    +7,046 /106
    that last try by the warriors hurt us. It would have been much better to be 12 up instead of 6
     
  5. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    18,959
    1,611
    Ratings:
    +5,066 /188
    Shouldnt we be above the sharks with more in the for column??
     
  6. byso

    byso Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +84 /0
    In the top 8 were we'll stay.
     
  7. Dan

    Dan Kim Jong Dan Staff Member Administrator 2017 Tipping Competitor 2016 Tipping Competitor

    33,379
    3,989
    Ratings:
    +7,046 /106
    Fluffy it works on differenial not for and against.

    So we both have a differential of 6. It then goes to Alphabetical name.
     
  8. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member

    Ratings:
    +214 /5
    I thought the same. It is all academic now anyhow, though we have a chance to leapfrog them this weekend with a win at The Place of Pain!!!!
     
  9. Fluffy

    Fluffy Well-Known Member

    18,959
    1,611
    Ratings:
    +5,066 /188
    After round one we are 1st. The diffferential only ever counts after round 26.

    We are 6th in attack, same as last year

    We are 6th indefence - YEEEEHAAAWWW
     
  10. PEPSI

    PEPSI Active Member

    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    we would have even been ahead of of the roosters if it wsnt for that lsat try if its tru about the alphabetical thingey!!!

    start the semis now! ha!
     
  11. Larry Tate

    Larry Tate Member

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Bugger that,we'd be playing the Dogs! :O
     
  12. Ice Fusion

    Ice Fusion Member

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    The first two tries were unfortunate, I would have enjoyed keeping them tryless. As for the ladder it's good to see Newcastle where they belong.
    <span class='smallblacktext'>[ Edited Mon Mar 14 2005, 02:10PM ]</span>
     

Share This Page