NRL considers stardardising player match fees i

[Berkeley_Eagle]

NRL considers stardardising player match fees in bid to reward have-nots and rein in big-spending clubs

http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/nrl-considers-stardardising-player-match-fees-in-bid-to-reward-have-nots-and-rein-in-big-spending-clubs/story-e6frf3ou-1226237965956?from=public_rss


The NRL has raised the prospect of directly paying match fees to prevent clubs from over-spending and bridging the income gulf between star and standard players.

With the Independent Commission and TV rights deal still to be finalised, the precise details of the 2013 salary cap are set to remain a mystery until midway through this year.

But a much-improved broadcast agreement is expected to trigger a much fatter grant for the 16 clubs, most of which record substantial losses each year.

Instead of lifting the salary cap commensurately, NRL officials have proposed to pay players a set match fee from a central fund to ensure clubs use the increased grant to improve their bottom lines.


The idea was met with a mixed response when raised by salary cap auditor Ian Schubert last year, but does retain some support as the Independent Commission prepares to launch.

The NRL would pay players a set fee each time they take the field - on top of their club contracts.

NRL Surprise Packages

No exact figures have been raised, but players on match payments currently receive between $3000 and $5000 per first grade appearance from their clubs.

It's imagined the fee structure would give minimum contracted players - currently on $60,000-a-season - a bigger slice of the income pie.

"It was talked about last year, but there's nothing on the immediate radar at this stage."

Tigers director David Trodden - who represented the clubs during the protracted Independent Commission negotiations - was on Thursday confident the new regime will finally be in place by the end of this month.

After a brief stalemate over funding levels, all 16 clubs have signed off on new agreements with provision for grants to be reviewed on an annual basis in line with increased revenue.

Expected to command at least $1 billion a season, the TV rights deal cannot be struck until the commission is up and running.

 

[Dan]

This is probably not a bad idea in theory, but it will also probably see us lose more players to Union and god forbid AFL.

Unfortunately professional sport brings an expectation of big dollars, and everyone has their eyes on the prize.

Personally it's not a bad idea. I think a better idea would be that the clubs pay the NRL their players salary cost at the end of the year, and the NRL are the ones who pay the players and control this.

It won't stop all the rorting of the cap but it will help in that the NRL play the salaries, a further measure would be some kind of privacy statement where the NRL have access to the players group certs and tax record at the end of each financial year. That way they can audit and make sure the information in regards to the player payments are correct.

It won't stop brown paper bag payments, but nothing can really

 

[Clay]

Imagine how **** Parra are going to be if this is implemented. The cap would not rise as much and they have already gone out and spent big money.