Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Monaghan V Orford: The Stats, Head to Head

fLIP

UFO Hunter
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
7,475
Reaction score
2,892
Age:

Monaghan: 13/05/1980 - 25 years old
Orford: 22/04/1978 - 27 years old

Height:

Monaghan: 180cm
Orford: 172cm

Weight:

Monaghan: 84kgs
Orford: 78kgs

Appearances This Season:

Monaghan: 12
Orford: 12

Trys:

Monaghan: 5
Orford: 7

Tackles:

Monaghan: 219, Averages 18.3 Per Game
Orford: 145, Averages 12.1 Per Game

Offloads:

Monaghan: 9, Averages 0.8 Per Game
Orford: 4, Averages 0.3 Per Game

Kicks:

Monaghan: 122, Averages 10.2 Per Game
Orford: 127, Averages 10.6 Per Game

Try Assists:

Monaghan: 9
Orford: 14

Line Breaks:

Monaghan: 6
Orford: 8

Hitups:

Monaghan: 77
Orford: 61

Metres Gained:

Monaghan: 503
Orford: 657

Dummy Half Runs:

Monaghan: 7
Orford: 3

Errors:

Monaghan: 30
Orford: 21

Missed Tackles:

Monaghan: 28
Orford: 36
 

KaZa

Bencher
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,535
Reaction score
1,413
not much in it. Orford probably just better in attack and Monas is defence.

Monas seems to work harder in games as well. But what these stats do tell is that Orford is not worth 200k extra. That is certain. He hasnt even played Origin or Test footy.

Monas is also younger than Orford and has time to be better than Orford is.
 

Matabele

Journey Man
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,082
Reaction score
530
not much in it. Orford probably just better in attack and Monas is defence.
Half backs are in the side for their attack, not their defence.

I see you're back Flip?
 

KaZa

Bencher
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,535
Reaction score
1,413
no thats where your wrong Mata. Their in the side for both. Monas attack aint as bad as you make out though.
 

Matabele

Journey Man
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
23,082
Reaction score
530
Then the Broncos should drop Lockyer and the Bulldogs Sherwin, seeing as they miss so many tackles.
 

KaZa

Bencher
Joined
Oct 19, 2004
Messages
2,535
Reaction score
1,413
I never said they should be dropped.

Best halfback in the world is Andrew Johns and he has both good attack and defence. Geoff Toovey is another great example.
 

Fluffy

Journey Man
Joined
Nov 12, 2004
Messages
21,163
Reaction score
7,854
Half backs are in the side for their attack, not their defence.

go watch NFL if you want that 2 seperate teams stuff.

all 17 players are in the side for attack AND defence.

Thats why we are where we are.
 

PEPSI

Bencher
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Messages
2,578
Reaction score
2
I never said they should be dropped.

Best halfback in the world is Andrew Johns and he has both good attack and defence. Geoff Toovey is another great example.

With the greatest respect to the great man, Tooves was never a great attacking half back, individually brilliant, ie running at the line/gaps etc but setting up plays wasnt his strength, BUT he complimented a bloke called Cliffy Lyons who was the best ball playing 5/8 this club has had since Bozo.

When Tooves lost Cliffy, how long was it till he was moved to Hooker ? I wont place monaghs in the toovey class, however there games are quite simlilar except Tooves was yards quicker of the mark.
 

byso

First Grader
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
9,633
Reaction score
141
Monas has won more games in the possition as well! this year.
 

Staff online

Team P W L PD Pts
15 13 2 344 26
15 13 2 311 26
14 11 3 105 24
14 11 3 176 22
14 9 5 122 20
13 7 6 33 16
15 7 8 -11 14
14 6 8 -44 14
14 6 8 -121 14
14 5 9 -66 12
14 5 9 -70 12
15 6 9 -131 12
14 5 9 -62 10
15 5 10 -132 10
13 2 11 -204 6
15 3 12 -250 6
Top Bottom