Matthew Ridge: Rorting the salary cap easier than taking lolly from a baby

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at
  • Wwe are currently experience some server issues which I am working through and hoping to resolve soon, Please bare with me whilst I work through making some changes and possible intermittent outages.
  • Apologies all our server was runing rogue. I managed to get us back to a point from 2:45 today though there is an attachment issue i will fix shortly. Things should be smooth now though


Current Status: 24/7 Manly Fan
09 April 2006

IT WAS back in 1990 when I first signed to play rugby league with the Manly Sea Eagles. They gave me $35,000 for that first season, plus $2000 for a win or a draw, and $1500 for a loss. It was far from the biggest money going around.

But within two months, they had sorted me a job with a brewery, which paid $45,000 a year, plus a free car and gas.

I would go into work and read the paper, or even just leave the car out front with the engine running, walk through saying gidday to everyone, and head out the fire escape.

None of that was on the salary cap, and I wasn't the only one getting a deal like that.

That's just how far back salary cap rorts go in rugby league. Everyone in the game knows that the salary cap is a farce, and always has been. Now it's time the NRL admitted it.

I can assure you, from what I know and what I have seen, the salary cap is being rorted everywhere. The good clubs get away with it, and the not-so-good clubs don't. And it doesn't matter what level you set the cap at -even if it was $5m, big clubs would be trying to break it.

It's not that hard to do. I know one player who wanted to receive more money, but his club couldn't fit it under the cap. So he sold his apartment to a club official for $200,000 over the market value. Or another who sold his car, worth $15,000, to a club benefactor for $50,000 - it goes on all the time.

When I was playing, you would see top players at other clubs listed as earning $150,000 a season. By the time Super League came along, I was on $650,000-$700,000 a year, so can you honestly say these guys, all internationals, were on that much less?

But good luck to the smart clubs: as a player, I would want to go to the clubs with a smart front office rather than a club that says they are going to be squeaky-clean and start the season off four points behind the race. As a player, I would be gutted if that happened - I'd be walking past management shaking my head.

Policing the salary cap is just too hard. Both the clubs who've been caught for major breaches -the Bulldogs in 2003 and the Warriors this year - were caught by whistleblowers.

With all due respect to the NRL, they have got one guy -salary cap auditor Ian Schubert -in charge of making sure 15 clubs keep to the salary cap. But that's a full-time job for 15 people.

The NRL's argument is that the salary cap keeps the competition level, but I don't believe it.

If you have smart enough people in your front office, they will rally support, bring in sponsors and get individuals who want to see the club go well to stump up money. I'm not saying it's easy, but that's how it happens.

And why should the clubs that are good suffer because the clubs who aren't good can't keep up? It's a reward for mediocrity.

The players' association has threatened to go to court to challenge the salary cap, and I think that they have to.

Manly centre Terry Hill did the same thing in the 1990s when he took the ARL to court over the draft system, and won.

This is the same - it's restricting the players and their right to earn as much as they are able. When players these days have a maximum shelf life of 10 years, I don't see how it's fair to tell them there's a limit on their earnings when they are generating millions of dollars for the NRL, sponsors and television.

As a player, you want to make as much money as you can, as quickly as you can, because out in the real world, where you're unqualified, you're lucky if you'll make 15 bucks an hour. You have to make hay while the sun shines.
I think the proof is in the pudding as far as the cap leveling out the comp what is the stat 7 different premiers in 8 years and headaches all round in tipping comp's.


Journey Man
We were audited by Schubert with the Orford cap accusations by the other clubs. Too bad, and it sounds like bitter grapes to me !!!


Is it just me or is he trying to make a piss poor effort in trying to put Manly off their match?

Canteen Worker

First Grader
He is talking about 16 years ago. No rocket science there as the highest paid cellarmen were playing footy.

Superleague now means they can earn squillions without having to pretend to have another job!!!
Team P W L PD Pts
12 9 3 83 22
13 10 3 80 22
13 9 4 110 20
12 7 5 64 18
12 7 5 -37 18
13 7 6 133 16
13 7 6 81 16
13 7 6 47 16
13 7 6 -34 16
13 6 6 27 15
13 6 6 26 15
14 7 7 -26 14
13 6 7 -47 14
13 4 9 -111 10
12 3 9 -123 10
12 3 9 -136 10
12 2 10 -137 8
Top Bottom