Mansour dodges a charge for eye gouge

[Woodsie]

No. I have proved the ref is ****ed.

At least in your own mind ..

 

[mave]

Can't the ref be both human and ****ed?

 

[Under the Sticks]

So if you bump the head its not okay but if you go the next step to actually try and remove a body part on the said head e.g. an eye than that's okay NRL?

No wonder fans cannot follow this games rules of late. Now I hate the way RaRa is currently officiated but at least they stop at rule one - contact with the head....every time... but NRL letting an "accidental" eye gouge go unpunished really gets my goat!

 

[XV-1]

How slow was mansour when he got that “intercept”.

That was a dud call I reckon, looked like a knock on. The ref’s reluctance to blow the whistle in that circumstance was very strange to say the least.

the ball hit Mansour in the head/face - can't be a knock on.

 

[Shoe1]

the ball hit Mansour in the head/face - can't be a knock on.

If it did that’s fine. Seemed not clear cut to me

 

[ManEagle]

the ball hit Mansour in the head/face - can't be a knock on.

I thought it looked to hit him on the shoulder ?
But couldn't slow it down to see

 

[ManEagle]

I don't think Mansour tried to gouge Foz, I'm ok with the ref call. Same as I'm ok with the Lawton send off though at at the time I was expecting 10.
I'm not ok with the non knock on call for mansour, if that was called back,Lawton's tackle doesn't happen and it's a whole different ball game.