|
||
---|---|---|
![]() Sea Eagles |
Vs |
![]() Raiders |
40 |
4 Pines Park 23 Mar 2025 18:15 80:00 minute |
12 |
Sea Eagles | Stat | Raiders |
7 | Tries | 2 |
6/0 | Conversions | 2/7 |
/ | Penalty Goals | / |
0/0 | Field Goals/Attempts | 0/0 |
61% | Posession | 39% |
6 / 40 (40/46%) | Incomplete / Complete Sets ( Rate% ) | 10 / 19 (19/29%) |
58 | Time in Opposition Half | 42 |
1541m | Metres Gained | 989m |
4 | Penalties (Conceded) | 9 |
1 | Dropouts | 4 |
6 | Errors | 11 |
9/ | Dummy Half Runs/Metres | 8/ |
23/607 | Kicks/Kick Metres | 13/337 |
24/201 | Missed Tackles/Tackles | 33/352 |
Horsearse Horsbrough was the biggest culprit for this, so happy to see him get marched for a blatant offside in a probable try scoring opportunity.What a surprise. After the deliberate tactics of trying to lay all over us and slow us,down they got penalised for it shock, horror Ricky wasted his time coming to Brookvale because he doesn't know the rules. Well ain't that the truth. YOU CAN'T LAY ALL OVER THE FU*KING PLAYERS YOU TWAT !!!!
Did Sykes play?Sips was ok but not as dominant as I would have hoped. I like the work Patolo did. Hits hard and made some good runs. Navale ok as well. Good speed and ball work. Not sure about the step up. I think he's worth a go when we're down on troops during Origin if he keeps coming aling. I thouhgt Pua'avase did some good things as well. Work in progress but potential. But Sips looks most likely to return. I reckon.
Did Sykes play?
Funny you should ask coz I don't remember seeing him. I don't think he did. I'm sure someone played in 14 and that No wasn't listed and definitely wasn't Sykes. I see I'm now starting to sound like an unreliable witness 😀Did Sykes play?
Does anyone know if koula was injured? I note he was on his back with a few minutes left and we ended playing with only 12 on the field.Still not convinced about Kouta and Faulalo. They get tackled too easily
They did look a bit lost for options early but to their credit, the Raiders defence was solid early. I did yell out a few times for someone to straighten, that's for sure. I thought Burbo did a good job of doing that most times. And Aloaia also.Thought we took the usual game plan out there yesterday. give it to Tom and at min 25 someone said Toms not playing
A couple of bombs and dummy half dive overs showed we had really good discipline, kept the errors down, but despite all the ball couldn't really muster a movement to crack em . No desire to play direct which is not new
Good win but did nothing to put the flat track bully tag to rest. Dce as busy as ive seen him
The cows, then us , then the raiders, just momentumed out of the game
Can believe he moaned about the 6 agains. Raiders are lucky it wasn’t upwards of twenty with their plan of slowing the ruck becoming ridiculous throughout the game. I like Ricky but geez he really had no right to carry on like he did about the loss. I’m glad Siebs decided not to bite back & let it be.Ricky's presser about refs after every loss:
![]()
I disagree. How can a team get canned one match for six-agains and be deemed to be perfect the next? Manly is the perfect example: games 1 and 3 at Brookie we were angels, yet in round 2 away from home we copped it 11-2.Can believe he moaned about the 6 agains. Raiders are lucky it wasn’t upwards of twenty with their plan of slowing the ruck becoming ridiculous throughout the game. I like Ricky but geez he really had no right to carry on like he did about the loss. I’m glad Siebs decided not to bite back & let it be.
I can't help feeling that the NRL has encouraging the refs to give the home 'sausage eaters' what they want. It's the best way to ensure booming home crowds. It explains why results are fluctuating more this season than what they should be.
Home ground advantage has always been a thing. But if you think the NRL has now 'encouraged' refs to favour the home side you might want to check your 5G (!)I disagree. How can a team get canned one match for six-agains and be deemed to be perfect the next? Manly is the perfect example: games 1 and 3 at Brookie we were angels, yet in round 2 away from home we copped it 11-2.
I can only come up with one explanation: referee bias to the home team.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
2 | 2 | 0 | 44 | 6 |
![]() |
3 | 3 | 0 | 32 | 6 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 38 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 36 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 36 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 33 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | -4 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 2 | 1 | -12 | 4 |
![]() |
3 | 1 | 2 | -6 | 2 |
![]() |
2 | 0 | 2 | -9 | 2 |
![]() |
3 | 1 | 2 | -38 | 2 |
![]() |
3 | 0 | 3 | -28 | 0 |
![]() |
3 | 0 | 3 | -64 | 0 |
![]() |
3 | 0 | 3 | -72 | 0 |