From what Robinson and Seibold have stated that game will defensive due to the tighter field. It may be a grind of a match. Our team will reflect that.
Just on the Rabbits, Cody Walker could be good to go and if that's the case he'll be taking a flight to LV in a couple of days. Strange they didn't take him in the first place even if it's just as a spectator...mmm ?
Cody Walker sounds like a Texas Ranger. I think they'd let him in purely based on that, no matter the record Lets hope he doesn't fire a shot on the field.If anyone's got a record that bans them from the USA it'd be Cody, angriest human alive.
The tighter field will really restrict South’s attack as they are renowned for their sweeping backline plays. Their wingers will run out of room which is where the score most of their try’s. Points will be at a premiumFrom what Robinson and Seibold have stated that game will defensive due to the tighter field. It may be a grind of a match. Our team will reflect that.
Completely agree. I think this will be a big factor in the game. Look for more switches 1 or 2 off the ruck because they will run out of room wide.The tighter field will really restrict South’s attack as they are renowned for their sweeping backline plays. Their wingers will run out of room which is where the score most of their try’s. Points will be at a premium
How much smaller is this field ?Completely agree. I think this will be a big factor in the game. Look for more switches 1 or 2 off the ruck because they will run out of room wide.
It is a bit of a dud having the small field. Defence will dominate.
How much smaller is this field ?
My inclusion of Lawton is not necessarily my choice. I just think Seibs will be conservative for this game. Having said that, I think he'll do a job for us. But I agree, there's no "x factor" on my proposed bench. I think that could have been Shu (had he been fit) to rotate with Burbo. Would Gordie or Humphries provide that "x factor" or significant spark? Not sure.Dont get the sudden rush for Lawton on the bench.
If we are subbing Croker off it should be to inject some spark. A Humphrey's or GCKT for 20 minutes.
Lawton offers no value at hooker beyond injury cover or giving Croker a rest IMO.
Play the future, and I don't buy the experience talk, it's 20min off the bench, they'll be grand.
Well I stand corrected.Dont get the sudden rush for Lawton on the bench.
If we are subbing Croker off it should be to inject some spark. A Humphrey's or GCKT for 20 minutes.
Lawton offers no value at hooker beyond injury cover or giving Croker a rest IMO.
Play the future, and I don't buy the experience talk, it's 20min off the bench, they'll be grand.
Lawmans a proven defender and has a bit of white line fever in his game that I don't mind.Dont get the sudden rush for Lawton on the bench.
If we are subbing Croker off it should be to inject some spark. A Humphrey's or GCKT for 20 minutes.
Lawton offers no value at hooker beyond injury cover or giving Croker a rest IMO.
Play the future, and I don't buy the experience talk, it's 20min off the bench, they'll be grand.
Interesting strategy you have with Parker @Jay Eagle, so I think Seibs will pull Parker out of the trial and 1 of either Gordie / Humphreys
The Woods option is a possibility as it has been made very clear by Seibold that he will become an option when injury strikes .I don't think Woods is eligible to play
I personally don't think either Parker or Woods should be anywhere near the 17 if we want to win the compInteresting strategy you have with Parker @Jay Eagle
Will you have him in the starting side or as an Impact bench player ?
We share the same perspective with the slow used by date Parker and WoodsI personally don't think either Parker or Woods should be anywhere near the 17 if we want to win the comp
Just purely down to numbers @BOZO. We are missing a few
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
24 | 19 | 5 | 243 | 44 | |
24 | 17 | 7 | 186 | 40 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 275 | 38 | |
24 | 16 | 8 | 222 | 38 | |
24 | 15 | 9 | 89 | 36 | |
24 | 14 | 10 | 96 | 34 | |
24 | 13 | 10 | 113 | 33 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -40 | 30 | |
24 | 12 | 12 | -127 | 30 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -1 | 28 | |
24 | 11 | 13 | -126 | 28 | |
24 | 10 | 14 | -70 | 26 | |
24 | 9 | 14 | -62 | 25 | |
24 | 8 | 16 | -168 | 22 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -155 | 20 | |
24 | 7 | 17 | -188 | 20 | |
24 | 6 | 18 | -287 | 18 |