Might knock some sense into him to get back on the wing? Just joking…. badly.Grade one HIA, under the rules he misses 11 days,
|
||
---|---|---|
Sea Eagles |
Vs |
Panthers |
32 |
4 Pines Park 06 Apr 2024 17:30 80:00 minute |
18 |
Sea Eagles | Stat | Panthers |
5 | Tries | 3 |
6/0 | Conversions | 3/6 |
/ | Penalty Goals | / |
0/1 | Field Goals/Attempts | 0/0 |
47% | Posession | 53% |
8 / 36 (36/44%) | Incomplete / Complete Sets ( Rate% ) | 12 / 29 (29/41%) |
48 | Time in Opposition Half | 52 |
1531m | Metres Gained | 1644m |
3 | Penalties (Conceded) | 11 |
2 | Dropouts | 3 |
12 | Errors | 11 |
4/ | Dummy Half Runs/Metres | 5/ |
20/564 | Kicks/Kick Metres | 17/452 |
41/278 | Missed Tackles/Tackles | 31/295 |
Might knock some sense into him to get back on the wing? Just joking…. badly.Grade one HIA, under the rules he misses 11 days,
I think losing Garrick was actually a blessing in disguise. Our defense was so much sharper with Burbo in the centres.To win with losing Garrick so early is a huge plus for us. One of the our best wins in along time imo
Yeah I'm starting to get Ben Kennedy vibes from Brown, he lifts the entire team.I swear, after Brown made those inspirational runs, I saw Jake take a hit up and his leg speed doubled as he pumped those legs as hard as he could. It was a beautiful thang.
Yeah the thing about Cleary is he wins them games when their forwards completely destroy the opposition. That wasn’t happening last night so it would have been interesting to see what sort of difference he could have made. His 5th tackle option are definitely superior to what we saw from Penrith yesterday. But yeah, we’ll never know.We had them under pressure for most of the game and they didn't handle it well, they may have had a few more points in them had Cleary played but not enough to win the game methinks, well done to all our boys particularly our forwards and our right side defence 👍👍👍
I think Edwards is a great fb in that panthers team. Just knows his role well like the rest and does it well. The reason he’s not mentioned with the big gun fbs is he’s not flashy and more of a toiler. I’ve always thought it would be interesting to see how he’d go at a lesser club. I doubt he’d be mentioned in the origin conversation if he were at the dogs or tigers.You know, when the Panthers first started to come good, I thought Dylan Edwards was the only weak spot in their team, and that they'd never win a premiership with him as their fullback. Which means he has either improved out of sight, or I am an awful judge of talent. (Both are probably true.) But man, he just gets the job done. So much determination, all effort on every play. He's so important to that team, and has willed himself into the company of Teddy, Turbo, Walsh, etc as one of the best fullbacks running around.
Yep out for 11 I’d think.What grade concussion did Ruebs get? Will he miss next week?
Found it - 17,381.Can’t find the official crowd number anywhere. What was it?
Technically, not a knock on. Objectively, been called a knock on forever, everyday.Am I blind or just too biased to see it?
We have this deluge of media comments making spurious comments about a supposed knock on that led to Koula's try. Lets not talk about Manly's performance in defeating last year's premiers. Lets talk about an alleged knock on leading to a try. And regrettably because they have declared that belief, it has become the truth somehow and no doubt will be the big talking point.
Now I've watched the replay of this incident several times. The ball is passed by a Penrith player, hits a Manly player's arm when he tried to grab it, and falls behind him, not in front of him. He's standing still so that's not an issue. It bounces and continues in a backward motion, leading to Koula picking up the ball behind the other Manly player and racing down field. The ref gave it the OK. The bunker gave it the OK. But the media declared it a blatant knock on. Even Penrith seemed convinced it was a knock on.
Now what is a knock on? According to the definition;
Knock-on: When a player loses possession of the ball and 'it goes forward', or when a player 'hits the ball forward with the hand or arm, or when the ball hits the hand or arm and goes forward', and the ball touches the ground or another player before the original player can catch it.
Now, am I being biased? The ball fell out backwards and then bounced backwards. The Manly player was stationary. How on Earth can that be declared a knock on? Fair dinkum some of these media bogons seem not to understand the basic fundamentals of the game. Above is a quite simple definition of what a knock on is. Do they not know that? Where the hell do they come up with 'knock on' and then make that the major talking factor of the game. Someone needs to kick a few of them in the head to get their brains in synch with reality.
No, objectively, it has been incorrectly called a knock on forever, everyday and it's about time that an NRL referee actually had the guts to correctly call it a knock back instead of trying to cover their own arse.Technically, not a knock on. Objectively, been called a knock on forever, everyday.
I find when he is on camera he delivers as if doing a presentation.Watching the press conference I’m wondering if DCE has some spectrum stuff going on. I find his interviews a little Rain Man like, and it would explain some of the clues we’ve seen around his “prickliness” over the years… for example, not fitting into those earlier QLD teams, or just the general impression many of us have around his on camera persona. And I don’t share that as a negative or criticism, to be clear… just an observation of interest.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |