Cowboys have more wins away from home at 4 pines (Brookie), than any other ground they have played at away from home.
![]() |
V |
![]() |
0 | 0 | |
4 Pines Park08 Mar 2025 07:35 PM |
# | Player | Player | # |
---|---|---|---|
1 | T. Trbojevic | S. Drinkwater | 1 |
2 | J. Saab | B. Burns | 2 |
3 | T. Koula | J. Purdue | 3 |
4 | R. Garrick | V. Vailea | 4 |
5 | L. Hopoate | M. Taulagi | 5 |
6 | L. Brooks | T. Dearden | 6 |
7 | D. Cherry-Evans | T. Duffy | 7 |
8 | T. Paseka | J. McLean | 8 |
9 | J. Tevaga | R. Robson | 9 |
10 | S. Taukeiaho | S. McIntyre | 10 |
11 | H. Olakau'atu | J. Bateman | 11 |
12 | B. Trbojevic | J. Nanai | 12 |
13 | J. Trbojevic | R. Cotter | 13 |
14 | J. Simpkin | K. Lawton | 14 |
15 | C. Waddell | H. Edwards | 15 |
16 | E. Bullemor | G. Neame | 16 |
17 | T. Sipley | C. Hess | 17 |
18 | C. Faulalo | K. O'Donnell | 18 |
19 | D. Matterson | J. Clifford | 19 |
20 | G. Chan Kum Tong | T. Mikaele | 20 |
21 | J. Arthur | J. Paulo | 21 |
22 | J. Aloiai | J. Taumalolo | 22 |
You gotta laugh. I remember Luke Williamson used to cop that back in the day, circa 2007-2008. The guy mysteriously racked up over 200 NRL games without ever being first grade standard, lol2. I loathe the 'not first grade standard' and 'wouldnt play first grade elsewhere' comments....very very ocassionally you may be right but 90% of the time people are talking about players who have played 50 or 100 plus NRL games or have played at 2 or 3 clubs.
Sounds like this is just the game the team we could have but didn't find a way to get the job done in years past.Cowboys have more wins away from home at 4 pines (Brookie), than any other ground they have played at away from home.
Watching the two trials live I thought he was very good defensively and put some sting into a few bigger players, Dias in the second trial was a good hit.Simpkin wasn't great defensively in the trials
He wasn't in the first grade side very much when we finally won the premiership.You gotta laugh. I remember Luke Williamson used to cop that back in the day, circa 2007-2008. The guy mysteriously racked up over 200 NRL games without ever being first grade standard, lol
Yeah I’m not sure about jazz at hooker either. I can’t ever recall thinking he’s really sharp or quick when watching him previously. Just seemed like an honest hardworking forward. Bit like Croker. No real spark there. Hope I’m wrong though.Watching the two trials live I thought he was very good defensively and put some sting into a few bigger players, Dias in the second trial was a good hit.
I just looked at the stats out of the two trials and first trial 35 tackles no misses, second trial 33 tackles and two misses.
I think he has improved his defence, I don’t think Tevega has started in the nine jumper for a few years, I think it’s a step sideways with the selection there.
Seibold obviously wants a very specific thing from his hooker and Jazz will offer closer to what Croker does. So it’s then a straight swap when Croker comes back.Yeah I’m not sure about jazz at hooker either. I can’t ever recall thinking he’s really sharp or quick when watching him previously. Just seemed like an honest hardworking forward. Bit like Croker. No real spark there. Hope I’m wrong though.
Jazz was starting hooker for Samoa in both tests v England at the end of last year. Played 55 min and 41 min so Simpkin will get a lot of game time against Cows.I think he has improved his defence, I don’t think Tevega has started in the nine jumper for a few years, I think it’s a step sideways with the selection there.
I watched those two games, Jazz did a job in distributing the ball from dummy half but didn’t challenge the English with a handful of runs in both games.Jazz was starting hooker for Samoa in both tests v England at the end of last year. Played 55 min and 41 min so Simpkin will get a lot of game time against Cows.
They were actually pretty good away from home last season, too. They will be a challenge.Cowboys have more wins away from home at 4 pines (Brookie), than any other ground they have played at away from home.
Wholeheartedly agree. Tevaga's strengths have always been bringing energy as a mobile middle forward off the bench, with the added bonus of utility if, by necessity, he had to cover dummy half. Playing him at 9 early, not only diminishes our threat from dummy half - even more so than Croker, but also takes away from his impact later in the game when we would really need it. He may be experienced, but he's a step down from Croker at 9 in literally every aspect of the game.I watched those two games, Jazz did a job in distributing the ball from dummy half but didn’t challenge the English with a handful of runs in both games.
I thought Gordon outplayed him in those two games and got more minutes in the second game.
The thought that Jazz is there to do the tough work doesn’t read well either looking at the statistics 71 tackles and 9 misses in both those games.
No knock against Tevega who openly discussed his best position is a middle and not a spine player.
Really? When you look at last year's results, I’d argue it was our inability to beat the “weaker” teams that hurt us more than the top teams.This line-up is basically the same as last year's, which realistically and ultimately, was uncompetitive with the best sides. To make it worse , IMO, we have been bolstered by a few aging players cast off from their previous clubs. As an example, the selection of Tevaga as run on dummy-half points to a problematic depth situation. The backs are top class but generally most of the back-ups in NSW Cup are not near to NRL standard, so hoping against hope we don't have injuries to a number of key players. One bright light - the emergence of Hopoate who during the trials played with more poise and physical maturity as compared with last season. Wish we had a few more local juniors like him.
Possibly but on the flipside if Tevaga is distributing and defending the first twenty when there is less space around the ruck, that allows a fresh Simpkin to be more of a threat once the middle opens a little.Wholeheartedly agree. Tevaga's strengths have always been bringing energy as a mobile middle forward off the bench, with the added bonus of utility if, by necessity, he had to cover dummy half. Playing him at 9 early, not only diminishes our threat from dummy half - even more so than Croker, but also takes away from his impact later in the game when we would really need it. He may be experienced, but he's a step down from Croker at 9 in literally every aspect of the game.
The biggest let down of this week's line up is not the 17 players named, but the roles they have been selected in. I hope I am proven wrong. The bench is a big drop to the starting pack in terms of ability and impact. It would make more sense to start with Waddell and Simpkin in the front row, and have Tevaga and either Taukeiaho/Paseka come from the bench so intensity can not only be sustained, but possibly even increased for the second 20min - always a weak period for us
How did he play? I thought he was brought in as some kind of bench impact player like Brown. I have to say, I don't really know much about how he plays. I saw a couple of Warrior games when he played and he seemed to play a bit like a Lawton role. I would prefer Lawton. Unless of course he blitzes it, then Lawton will be yesterday's manJazz was starting hooker for Samoa in both tests v England at the end of last year. Played 55 min and 41 min so Simpkin will get a lot of game time against Cows.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 2 |
![]() |
1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -6 | 0 |
![]() |
1 | 0 | 1 | -22 | 0 |