Long-serving player concessions

SeaEagleRock8

Sea Eagle Lach
Premium Member
Tipping Member
Right on cue, suddenly News is trumpeting the virtues of one-club players and long-serving player allowances with 2 separate pieces on foxsport site.

Now that Manly has lost most of our long-term players, they suddenly agree it is an issue!

http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-must-reward-player-loyalty-says-retired-roosters-legend-anthony-minichiello/story-fn2mcuj6-1227194978265


http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/nrl-season-2015-games-bosses-need-to-put-higher-price-on-player-loyalty/story-fn2mcuj6-1227194974797

Interesting to see that from our current roster Matai has played the most games for Manly (203), followed by Snake (200) and Ballin (195).

Wiki says Lyon has 190 and Wolfman might be next with 100.
 
Well Billy Slater is coming off-contract so...it wouldn't be fair if Storm couldn't retain him 🙄
 
I totally disagree with any concessions until it can help us again, we've lost so much in the last 3 years

Even lost Beaver to the lack of this
 
Obviously Souffs and Dogs have a group of players coming up to the right limit
 
Right on cue, suddenly News is trumpeting the virtues of one-club players and long-serving player allowances with 2 separate pieces on foxsport site.

It's truly amazing isn't it.

Hard not to be cynical.

NRL should just lift the salary cap to 10 million and let some of the billion they have tied up for their own 'war chest' super go.

The rlpa should..wait...the rlpa?? lololo hahah
 
I hope Foz and DCE both top 300 games for Manly

Me too, mate.

I did an almost thesis and statistically laden piece, and sent it through to the NRL about the long serving player allowance, which was summarily ignored.

There is NO ****ing way players like Watmough, Stewart, Matai & others should have to think about uprooting their families. That's NOT what the cap was designed to do. They need to even the game out with something different.

What? I'm not sure, but there should be an individual compensation PER PLAYER that is at a club over a certain amount of years, and that compensation needs a multiplier if that particular player is a local junior.
 
To be fair the NRL also needs to balance against clubs under paying players in say years 8 & 9 and then allowing a form of back ending in a salary cap exempt payment (and you know this would happen with slater at the storm(

I guess what I am saying is as much as it has hurt us I am not sure there is a simple solution
 
Not surprisingly.....I agree that concessions need to be made.

But it should be based on the number of first grade games played. Set it at 200 and offer further concessions at 250.

I don't believe Kitey or Gift would have had to leave we're these measures in place. Just another example of the Keystone Cops approach of the NRL.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 17 14 0 3 108 32
2 Storm 15 11 0 4 202 28
3 Bulldogs 15 11 0 4 92 28
4 Warriors 15 10 0 5 11 26
5 Broncos 16 9 0 7 68 22
6 Sea Eagles 16 8 0 8 58 22
7 Sharks 17 9 0 8 8 22
8 Panthers 15 7 1 7 3 21
9 Dolphins 17 8 0 9 150 20
10 Roosters 15 7 0 8 14 20
11 Dragons 15 6 0 9 -49 18
12 Cowboys 16 6 1 9 -140 17
13 Knights 16 6 0 10 -67 16
14 Tigers 16 6 0 10 -82 16
15 Eels 15 5 0 10 -103 16
16 Rabbitohs 17 6 0 11 -129 16
17 Titans 15 4 0 11 -144 14
Back
Top Bottom