manlyfan76
There is no A.I. Just better computers
Schuster has versatility as a 5/8 or ball playing lock.
Schuster doesn't have the work ethic to make 40 tackles a game and ball play at lockSchuster has versatility as a 5/8 or ball playing lock.
I’m pretty sure even though Latu had 7 on his back yesterday he was playing 5/8. He was attacking and defending on the left all game and Abbey on the rightMost likely no coincidence that Latu is being tried as a 7 now with the view of him being a ready made replacement for D C E . Then with the option that he can always cover a 6 role . Thought some time ago that that could be a future scenario with either Shu or Weekes as future Manly 6 's [ or Shu as the 13 ] and Latu as the 7 . Was not sure previously that Latu as a 7 would suit his style of play but looked quite comfortable there yesterday and can only get better and more confident with more time and experience there . Humphries is still probably capable of offering something worthwhile as a 7 too but for i st grade requirements , someone like Latu would be more in favor now or definitely likely going forward .
Yes, it's not like he's played second row and tackled at over 90% for the season.Schuster doesn't have the work ethic to make 40 tackles a game and ball play at lock
Schuster has versatility as a 5/8 or ball playing lock.
Given he’s contracted til end of ‘25,doubt this is possible/true unless Manly have given him permission.Schuster on the other hand…….Unconfirmed report over at tigers forum that Latu signed with them **** I hope not
I predict we are losing one of the 2. Seems more likely it will be Josh in 2025Given he’s contracted til end of ‘25,doubt this is possible/true unless Manly have given him permission.Schuster on the other hand…….
DCE is on $1.3 mil and we're not paying Latu more than $500K in the next couple years.I didn't think of Latu as a half but watched yesterday's Blacktown game and he did well, so yeah i don't think it's a case of Latu v Schu as the thread title puts it, more a Latu and Schu possible future halves combo.
However i think you're dreaming is you think we'll save 800K! Both guys are already on huge money and if they cut the mustard as NRL halves they'll probably soon be on more than we're spending now.
DCE is signed until the end of 2025Considering he has just turned 18, Latu is coming along really well. Already looks comfortable out there. The main concern, assuming he stays with us, will be timing of the handover. How many years will DCE keep playing?
Shifting Humphreys back to Flegg to play 9 also seems to confirm the direction the club is goingSchuster has made it certain in pressers that he wants to be a one club player at Manly. Latu also will stay faithful for how the club stuck by Nase, I know it was Des and he is gone now but the club still had a big role in it. And Sam Fainu debuting this year before older brothe Sione Fainu for the tigers show how much we prioritise the brothers. Latu is now being given the 7 at reggies and he will adopt a dominant playmaking, halfback type role and work on that for the next year or so in reserve grade against men so he can be ready to be the foil for Schuster when Chez retires. It's an exiciting potential long term plan. Schuey also maturing his game at 6 with another 2 years before Latu is ready will be perfect as well. That halves combination will work.
Could work out perfectly, Latu gets a taste next year, regular 1st grade off the bench in '25, ready for the full time gig in '26. As long as we don't lose him that seems like a sensible time line.DCE is signed until the end of 2025
All this talent coming through over last few years has eventuated to nothing !I’m pretty sure even though Latu had 7 on his back yesterday he was playing 5/8. He was attacking and defending on the left all game and Abbey on the right
Yep, but if he chooses to play on (and he might), I can't see us telling him, "Thanks, but no thanks, old fella."DCE is signed until the end of 2025
Interesting. Where would that leave Gordie? Do you think they'd be sharing the role? Tough to know as the game keeps changing. One year it seems reasonable to to have 2 DMs, then the rules change and maybe it's not necessary. A bit hard to plan for the future these days.Shifting Humphreys back to Flegg to play 9 also seems to confirm the direction the club is going
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |