Kasiano cleared to play

Stevo said:
lol. I'm a fan of the Mystics. They have that big grumpy looking GK and the hot GA i think she is that play in the NZ national team.

Yeah mate Maria Tutaia isnt the worst !!
 
Kiwi Eagle said:
Stevo said:
lol. I'm a fan of the Mystics. They have that big grumpy looking GK and the hot GA i think she is that play in the NZ national team.

Yeah mate Maria Tutaia isnt the worst !!

Also hand in your man card and report for immediate castration for knowing the name of a netball player
 
Daniel said:
Kiwi Eagle said:
Stevo said:
lol. I'm a fan of the Mystics. They have that big grumpy looking GK and the hot GA i think she is that play in the NZ national team.

Yeah mate Maria Tutaia isnt the worst !!

Also hand in your man card and report for immediate castration for knowing the name of a netball player

Mate you should check out a few of them, well worth a look haha
 
Can we make this post a sticky?

Well debated...no name calling and ends with some gentle p*ss taking with everyone respecting each other's ops

My big issue with the tackle will be consistency in the future - i think that is what all fans after
 
lsz said:
Can we make this post a sticky?

Well debated...no name calling and ends with some gentle p*ss taking with everyone respecting each other's ops

Well, Dan did infer stevo was soft and he should play netball (also disparaging to netball)

My earlier point still stands:


....well it should open a whole new range of biomechanic experts at the judiciary.

Whilst understanding the 'arm can't vanish' argument, at what point does the judiciary agree are acceptable time frames v distance?

Is it 50cm in 0.4 seconds as was this case, 60 in 0.8? What about reflex tests? A halfback has quicker reflex's than a forward usually.

Go Manly!
 
globaleagle said:
lsz said:
Can we make this post a sticky?

Well debated...no name calling and ends with some gentle p*ss taking with everyone respecting each other's ops

Well, Dan did infer stevo was soft and he should play netball (also disparaging to netball)

My earlier point still stands:


....well it should open a whole new range of biomechanic experts at the judiciary.

Whilst understanding the 'arm can't vanish' argument, at what point does the judiciary agree are acceptable time frames v distance?

Is it 50cm in 0.4 seconds as was this case, 60 in 0.8? What about reflex tests? A halfback has quicker reflex's than a forward usually.

Go Manly!

The judiciary works on a presumption of guilt and not innocence. It's up to the player and their team to prove such things I would say a whole second rather than a fraction of would be needed at minimum in this example. No doubting it looked bad but I can't see anything that kasiano could have done to avoid this
 
lsz said:
Can we make this post a sticky?

Well debated...no name calling and ends with some gentle p*ss taking with everyone respecting each other's ops

My big issue with the tackle will be consistency in the future - i think that is what all fans after

You should know by now Isz that the only consitency the judiciary offers is inconsistancy.
 
Kiwi Eagle said:
So for the crew that said he should have copped a suspension, would you have Matai and Stewart in trouble ?

Kasiano's was a lot worse then both of those, they wont be charged.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom