JUDICIARY CHARGES
- Thread starter kimox
- Start date
-
We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
If we challenge and lose does it go up to 2 weeks ?
Brissie Kid
Bencher
Kiwi Eagle said:
Yup.
HappilyManly
Journey Man
Let's go Manly, you got Gifty into the GF in 2011, now do it for Skivi 
Maybe just challenge the grading (if that would even make a difference?)Ceagle said:
Either way it is positive news, compared with what some media vultures were eagerly hoping for.
Brissie Kid
Bencher
I think even if gets downgrade to Grade 1 would still mean missing two games.
If he goes to judiciary it would only be worth it if he was trying to be exonerated of doing a Grade 1 or 2 high tackle at all. That would seem unlikely to win. Then again could point to the Jeremy Smith tackle.
If he goes to judiciary it would only be worth it if he was trying to be exonerated of doing a Grade 1 or 2 high tackle at all. That would seem unlikely to win. Then again could point to the Jeremy Smith tackle.
Happiest man in Australia right now - Brent Tate. (Now he only has to watch out for T Rex)
I'll cop the 1 week for Steve. It could've been worse due to his record.
But if they (match review committee and media) are going to be fair dinkum......there was an identical tackle in the Canberra v Cronulla game yesterday. I think there was a penalty given for it but i'm sure whoever it was (can't remember) was not put on report, also seems like no one got cited.
How is that fair?:dodgy:
But if they (match review committee and media) are going to be fair dinkum......there was an identical tackle in the Canberra v Cronulla game yesterday. I think there was a penalty given for it but i'm sure whoever it was (can't remember) was not put on report, also seems like no one got cited.
How is that fair?:dodgy:
manlywarringah said:
The Jeremy Smith tackle was slightly worse in my opinion as the point of contact was marginally higher and there was no sudden change of direction by the ball carrier. Surely you'd juxtapose the 2 tackles in your defence and ask why the different outcomes ?
Jatz Crackers
First Grader
With Steves c/o points even if we were successful with a challenge to the grading back to a grade 1 we would still lose him for a week.
EG: 75points + 50% loading less 25% early plea + 46 c/o = 130 (still 1 match)
EG: 75points + 50% loading less 25% early plea + 46 c/o = 130 (still 1 match)
eagle chick
Reserve Grader
Probably the best possible outcome. Let's hope that Jamie Lyon is back this week, and Matai will be able to come back next week should we face Melbourne.
the mauler
Bencher
I'd fight it. We desperately need him this week with Killer also probably missing. Next week Killer should be back and Whare could fill in if Matai gets 2 weeks. If we lose both Killer and Matai this week were f*****.
stoodamire
Bencher
I was hoping grade 1 =(.
If Lyon i plays, take the early plea. If not, fight it.
If Lyon i plays, take the early plea. If not, fight it.
| Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 10 |
|
5 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 10 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 48 | 8 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 28 | 8 |
|
5 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 8 |
|
5 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 8 |
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 38 | 7 |
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 7 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | -13 | 6 |
|
5 | 2 | 3 | -15 | 6 |
|
6 | 3 | 3 | -36 | 6 |
|
6 | 2 | 4 | -5 | 4 |
|
6 | 2 | 4 | -7 | 4 |
|
5 | 0 | 5 | -86 | 2 |
|
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 2 |
