frank stokes
I discriminate indiscriminately
I am not saying he is the greatest half ever but why the hell would you let Connor Watson go to then bring in Hastings and Gamble…They took a gamble on Gamble and blew their dough.
I am not saying he is the greatest half ever but why the hell would you let Connor Watson go to then bring in Hastings and Gamble…They took a gamble on Gamble and blew their dough.
Didn't Watson want a return to the Roosters tho.I am not saying he is the greatest half ever but why the hell would you let Connor Watson go to then bring in Hastings and Gamble…
By memory, I think they originally wanted a spine of:I am not saying he is the greatest half ever but why the hell would you let Connor Watson go to then bring in Hastings and Gamble…
Actually makes sense… Jackson works as a 9 in that line up…By memory, I think they originally wanted a spine of:
1. Garrick
6. Ponga
7. Brooks
9. Hastings
Which is so weird in hindsight.
They wanted that for 2023, and we were in crisis and it looked likely Garrick would leave. Obviously they had to change that when it became apparent that they weren't getting Brooks or Garrick.
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say we made the right call siding with DCE…Thought he went ok when he was with us tbh. Something went wrong between Hastings and DCE as I recall, after that it was see ya Jackson.
Team | P | W | L | PD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 5 | 1 | 59 | 12 | |
6 | 5 | 1 | 20 | 12 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 53 | 10 | |
6 | 4 | 2 | 30 | 10 | |
7 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 9 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -8 | 8 | |
7 | 4 | 3 | -18 | 8 | |
7 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 7 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 6 | |
6 | 2 | 4 | -31 | 6 | |
7 | 3 | 4 | -41 | 6 | |
7 | 2 | 5 | -29 | 4 | |
6 | 1 | 5 | -102 | 4 | |
6 | 0 | 6 | -90 | 2 |