Because no one is trading a 20 year old with potential for Nathan BrownWhy not someone 10yrs younger then?!
Because no one is trading a 20 year old with potential for Nathan BrownWhy not someone 10yrs younger then?!
Because no one is trading a 20 year old with potential for Nathan Brown
But this is the problem. Half of our 1st choice 17 will end up in rehab like this year because we get injured easily by being dominated by stronger, fitter, faster teams and then these low coin cast offs become our top 17 run on players. It doesn't work. Unless the club is prepared to build a team like Des did in 2005-2011 then we are consigned to just making up the numbers and never figuring in big finals matches.So… we replace someone who would be really low in the pecking order, with someone who also will be really low in the pecking order.
What’s the fuss about? You need these players.
If it doesn’t pay off, we gain another depth second rower, on the level of MCK. If it does pay off, we might get a suitable 14. All for low coin.
We’re not talking about first choice 17 members here.
That was not why Paseka or Haumole got injured. Nor Croker and Jake for that matter.Half of our 1st choice 17 will end up in rehab like this year because we get injured easily by being dominated by stronger, fitter, faster teams
thats cruel 🙂Agree. He has the spindly legs of Ryan Papenhuyzen with the speed of Nathan Brown.
This is terrible news. I’ve always loved it when manly played a team with bird in it because he is a total liability, a bird brain with poor discipline, a non entity. Ffs.
At least with Brown he plays direct and honest. No frills.
Dickie just falls out of Manly’s recent recruitment strategy,only by a couple of weeks thoughYou referring to
A. Greg
B. Jack
C. Dickie
D. Non of the above.
Jake Bird?It is a lateral move, who cares?
I see it as a marginal upgrade, tbh, as Brown is perhaps even more busted, and at least Bird can add second-row depth.
Good to see the usual suspects using it as another chance to bag the club, or Jake or whoever.
B.You referring to
A. Greg
B. Jack
C. Dickie
D. Non of the above.
How does swapping brown for bird free up a spot?I’d say the move is to free up a position for Moale to be here in 2026.
We didn’t have the space beforehand.
Big upgrade on Waddell 100%!!!!He may be getting on but he's a little More than mediocre !!
How does swapping brown for bird free up a spot?
You don’t think getting Viliame back is a good thing. Was playing well with us until his manager shopped him. Wasn’t given much opportunity at the Dragons but could be a plus. I’d have him over Waddell everyday!!Bird & Viliame. What a day.
Why won’t Bird be added to the top 30?Bird won’t be added to the top 30
Brown is removed from it.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Raiders | 24 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 148 | 44 |
2 | Storm | 24 | 17 | 0 | 7 | 212 | 40 |
3 | Bulldogs | 24 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 120 | 38 |
4 | Broncos | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 172 | 36 |
5 | Sharks | 24 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 109 | 36 |
6 | Warriors | 24 | 14 | 0 | 10 | 21 | 34 |
7 | Panthers | 24 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 107 | 33 |
8 | Roosters | 24 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 132 | 32 |
9 | Dolphins | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 125 | 30 |
10 | Sea Eagles | 24 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 21 | 30 |
11 | Eels | 24 | 10 | 0 | 14 | -76 | 26 |
12 | Cowboys | 24 | 9 | 1 | 14 | -146 | 25 |
13 | Tigers | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -135 | 24 |
14 | Rabbitohs | 24 | 9 | 0 | 15 | -181 | 24 |
15 | Dragons | 24 | 8 | 0 | 16 | -130 | 22 |
16 | Titans | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -199 | 18 |
17 | Knights | 24 | 6 | 0 | 18 | -300 | 18 |