1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How did we lose ?

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Utility Player, Jun 23, 2007.

  1. Utility Player

    Utility Player Well-Known Member

    +514 /6
    Interesting NRL stats

    Penalties Manly 9, Dogs 8

    Comp sets Manly 30/45, Dogs 34/45

    Tackles 323 to 295

    Missed tackles 37 to 62

    Line Breaks 4 - 5

    Offloads 19 -10

    Errors 14 - 12

    Possession 49% - 51%

    Tacklers Glen Stewart 43 Williams 32
    Lyon 33 Hughes 30
    Willo 31 Mason 29

    Metres Snake 187 Patten 181
    Kite 180 Mason 182
    Choc 171 Omealy 155

    Pretty even everywhere except the scoreboard
  2. DVS Matt

    DVS Matt Well-Known Member 2017 Tipping Competitor

    +29 /0
    we made errors at critical stages.

    we could only run sideways in attack
  3. DSM5

    DSM5 Well-Known Member

    +516 /0
    DVS said it all. The errors were in our own half. Does one make metres running across field? Choc and Kite my standouts in a well beaten team. Defense on our line was weak in the first half
  4. Utility Player

    Utility Player Well-Known Member

    +514 /6
    I agree with you both, I was just pointing out that the teams were pretty even stats wise and it was just our terrible execusion that cost us the game.

    Just a pothole on the road to premiership glory.
  5. Canteen Worker

    Canteen Worker Well-Known Member

    +215 /5
    There was a very bad patch in the second twenty minutes of the first half. A few dropped balls in our own half, a few spurious penalties at vital times (that should never have been given) and when Kite was off the paddock.

    Our penalties were late when we were playing catch up and their errors were in our quarter.

    Some can say the ref had little influence but look at the timing of the penalties, the consistency and the tolerance of their umbrella defence to be offside all night, turning us back inside all night - influenced the game big time.

    Had we scored with 15 to go (we went close four times) we would have had momentum and the pressure was on them.
  6. Ryan

    Ryan Well-Known Member

    +9,387 /402
    Attitude. Speed of play the balls. Commitment.
  7. Garts

    Garts Well-Known Member

    +844 /25
    Agree Ryan, however we really did get of to a flying start. A try then that chip from Monas which was almost another try then it all fell apart for us. Poor skill level, lack of intensity combined with a few poor ref calls at crucial times.
  8. Ron E. Gibbs

    Ron E. Gibbs Well-Known Member

    +2,336 /21
    We lost it just like we lost the game against Penrith: horrible options and a lack of composure at the back end of the game. It didn't help that we had a referee that let the opposition get away with murder in the play the ball (just like against Penrith), but by the time Archer got sick of it and started to blow his whistle we were shot. Plenty of opportunities to sustain pressure or score and we blew them all. (Just like against Penrith.)
    The Bulldogs played better than Penrith did, but we were terrible.
  9. mellonhead

    mellonhead Member

    +0 /0
    The five penalties late in 2nd half don't count, he should have sent players to the bin. 8 - 3 at critical stages and mistakes in our own 30 killed us.

Share This Page