Holmes a Court On price Max paid for Manly

  • We had an issue with background services between march 10th and 15th or there about. This meant the payment services were not linking to automatic upgrades. If you paid for premium membership and are still seeing ads please let me know and the email you used against PayPal and I cam manually verify and upgrade your account.
  • We have been getting regular requests for users who have been locked out of their accounts because they have changed email adresses over the lifetime of their accounts. Please make sure the email address under your account is your current and correct email address in order to avoid this in the future. You can set your email address at https://silvertails.net/account/account-details
  • Wwe are currently experience some server issues which I am working through and hoping to resolve soon, Please bare with me whilst I work through making some changes and possible intermittent outages.
  • Apologies all our server was runing rogue. I managed to get us back to a point from 2:45 today though there is an attachment issue i will fix shortly. Things should be smooth now though

Barks

Reserve Grader
Did anyone see on the back page program when Paul Kent took Peter to task about only offering 3M to buy a percentage of the Souths club, and he replied by saying he knows Joe Cross and and that his offer for Souths was on par with what Max paid for manly. Kent tried to make his case that Max paid much more, but Holmes a Court was pretty confident in his argument.

What do we understand to be the price Max paid when buying into manly?
 

Fluffy

Journey Man
about the same - 3M, however max bought 40% not 75%.

hand holmes a courts bid should be 5.75M
 

Dan

Kim Jong Dan
Staff member
Administrator
Tipping Member
Don't forget that Scott Penn is now in the picture as well for Many and yet the club still has the majority ownership.


the club doesnt have majority any more, max and penn do. the club has only 20%
 

Dan

Kim Jong Dan
Staff member
Administrator
Tipping Member
3 I thought only 2 but happy to take credit
 

Canteen Worker

First Grader
Byso - I need that 'kiss' emoticon.

Don't start me on politics though as you have zero credibility on that one - just like 'trust me' John.
 

byso

First Grader
Byso - I need that 'kiss' emoticon.

Don't start me on politics though as you have zero credibility on that one - just like 'trust me' John.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz....................You have no credability, especially when Latham the pride of your Labor party was proven to be a sham :yeah: :dance:

Anyhow champ, stop bringing politics in the footy forum ;)
 

Canteen Worker

First Grader
Not on this topic. I was waiting for the Latham retort coz that is all he has got.

Like me saying Roosters will be no good for this year because of Brett Papworth. (Problem with Liberal types - think it is still the 70s!!!!)
 

byso

First Grader
Not on this topic. I was waiting for the Latham retort coz that is all he has got.

Like me saying Roosters will be no good for this year because of Brett Papworth. (Problem with Liberal types - think it is still the 70s!!!!)

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..............let it go! Latham is gone and Shultz is your new saviour :blah: :blah:
 

Dan

Kim Jong Dan
Staff member
Administrator
Tipping Member
byso you missed the point!

I dont want to have to bring out the fools line but its getting dangerously close
 

shoe

Member
I think you'll find that Penn has 40%, max has 40% and the club has 40%. This enables the club to give 120% on the field each week.
 
Team P W L PD Pts
12 9 3 83 22
14 10 4 78 22
13 9 4 110 20
13 8 5 66 20
13 7 6 81 18
12 7 5 -37 18
13 7 6 133 16
13 7 6 47 16
13 7 6 -34 16
13 6 6 27 15
13 6 6 26 15
14 7 7 -26 14
13 6 7 -47 14
13 4 9 -111 10
12 3 9 -123 10
12 3 9 -136 10
12 2 10 -137 8
Back
Top Bottom