1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Harrigan's "Official View" re Wolfmans possible penalty try

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by mmmdl, Jul 31, 2012.

  1. mmmdl

    mmmdl Active Member

    305
    91
    Ratings:
    +105 /2
    Umm, if this is the case why did the referee then try and refer it to the video ref? Shortall clearly stuffed up by blowing the penalty without referring it upstairs.

    Oh, and to Warren Smith you moron - Manly didn't get lucky on that call. The high shot occurred BEFORE the alleged double movement, meaning referral or not, it would have always been a penalty at the very least to Manly.
     
  2. mmmdl

    mmmdl Active Member

    305
    91
    Ratings:
    +105 /2
    Umm, if this is the case why did the referee then try and refer it to the video ref? Shortall clearly stuffed up by blowing the penalty without referring it upstairs.

    Oh, and to Warren Smith you moron - Manly didn't get lucky on that call. The high shot occurred BEFORE the alleged double movement, meaning referral or not, it would have always been a penalty at the very least to Manly.
     
  3. Dan

    Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

    32,446
    3,652
    Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Ratings:
    +5,585 /78
    He blew the penalty before Wolfman had finished moving!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dan

      Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

      32,446
      3,652
      Amsterdam, The Netherlands
      Ratings:
      +5,585 /78
      He blew the penalty before Wolfman had finished moving!
       
    • Napper

      Napper Well-Known Member

      Ratings:
      +797 /1
      What a load of ****. I cant believe this clown. He's gotta go.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Napper

        Napper Well-Known Member

        Ratings:
        +797 /1
        What a load of ****. I cant believe this clown. He's gotta go.
         
      • Rex

        Rex Well-Known Member

        Ratings:
        +2,340 /60
        So now Harrigan is claiming the ref saw a double movement before blowing the whistle?

        Absolutely wonderful he has recruited referees who see into the future.
         
      • Rex

        Rex Well-Known Member

        Ratings:
        +2,340 /60
        So now Harrigan is claiming the ref saw a double movement before blowing the whistle?

        Absolutely wonderful he has recruited referees who see into the future.
         
      • Chip and Chase

        Chip and Chase True Supporter Staff Member Administrator Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

        12,806
        3,176
        Ratings:
        +6,293 /44
        ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. More of the same rubbish from Hollywood. He is the Iraqi Information Minister of the NRL. I was hoping there would be some accountability from the refs this year, instead we have seen even more creative ways of justifying stupid decisions.
         
      • Chip and Chase

        Chip and Chase True Supporter Staff Member Administrator Premium Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

        12,806
        3,176
        Ratings:
        +6,293 /44
        ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. More of the same rubbish from Hollywood. He is the Iraqi Information Minister of the NRL. I was hoping there would be some accountability from the refs this year, instead we have seen even more creative ways of justifying stupid decisions.
         
        • Like Like x 1
        • The Who

          The Who Well-Known Member

          7,324
          2,244
          Mona Vale
          Ratings:
          +4,940 /104
          Simply too much ego from Harrigan to be the boss of referees who are supposed to be seen and not heard.
           
        • The Who

          The Who Well-Known Member

          7,324
          2,244
          Mona Vale
          Ratings:
          +4,940 /104
          Simply too much ego from Harrigan to be the boss of referees who are supposed to be seen and not heard.
           
        • Jatz Crackers

          Jatz Crackers Moderator Staff Member

          9,138
          1,149
          Ratings:
          +1,247 /7
          I have been a big Harrigan supporter in years gone by. Ive adjusted my position this year. On current form he needs to go.
           
        • Jatz Crackers

          Jatz Crackers Moderator Staff Member

          9,138
          1,149
          Ratings:
          +1,247 /7
          I have been a big Harrigan supporter in years gone by. Ive adjusted my position this year. On current form he needs to go.
           
        • tookey

          tookey Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

          5,830
          1,542
          Ratings:
          +4,442 /137
          Harigan is a long time rabid parra supporter who hates manly with a passion. Biased opinions every time against Manly
           
        • tookey

          tookey Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

          5,830
          1,542
          Ratings:
          +4,442 /137
          Harigan is a long time rabid parra supporter who hates manly with a passion. Biased opinions every time against Manly
           
        • DSM5

          DSM5 Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

          Ratings:
          +516 /0
          It's interesting that when the illegal act was committed on a player attempting to place the ball on the try line, no try, penalty try or sin bin was considered. So now, does he mean that when a player takes another out as they are putting the ball down for a try, no try, just a penalty? Doesn't make any sense.
           
        • DSM5

          DSM5 Well-Known Member 2016 Tipping Competitor

          Ratings:
          +516 /0
          It's interesting that when the illegal act was committed on a player attempting to place the ball on the try line, no try, penalty try or sin bin was considered. So now, does he mean that when a player takes another out as they are putting the ball down for a try, no try, just a penalty? Doesn't make any sense.
           
        • Dan

          Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

          32,446
          3,652
          Amsterdam, The Netherlands
          Ratings:
          +5,585 /78
          What he is saying is that A Penalty try could have been awarded in this situation, however the referee deemed that the infringement was two fold and almost simultaneous.

          He is saying the ref got this wrong but is covering things up a little
           
        • Dan

          Dan Administrator Staff Member Administrator 2016 Tipping Competitor

          32,446
          3,652
          Amsterdam, The Netherlands
          Ratings:
          +5,585 /78
          What he is saying is that A Penalty try could have been awarded in this situation, however the referee deemed that the infringement was two fold and almost simultaneous.

          He is saying the ref got this wrong but is covering things up a little
           

        Share This Page