- Oct 8, 2011
Fair enough but I was commenting on this statement from the article:There is nothing unusual about this in my experience GE, most executive services agreements I have seen have something similar. Teflon would have given notice and said he is prepared to serve out the 6 months, the Commission would have said “yeah, nah” and decided paying out the rest of his contract was in everyone’s best interests. Not too dissimilar to our former coach, although our Club played harder and made him wait for his money.
"Greenberg’s lawyers outsmarted the NRL."
and something about and end of term style of contract etc. Dunno if you read it. I thought he stepped down immediately (his choice) not in 6 months. who knows But if it is not unusual and we are rid of him them that's fine.
I guess going early and being paid out in full is better than sticking by your code, taking a pay cut then not being re-signed.
Either way, he's a tosser but will unfortunately end up in another highly paid ceo sports job. His subtle comment to the media about how 'there is only a few of us' shows me again he's still a slimy doofus.
Thanks for letting me know!