I seem to remember they were favourites at different points throughout some seasons .... they were chokers...so at the end of the day yeah they were competitive but what have they got to show for it.
[quote author=PJ]
I seem to remember they were favourites at different points throughout some seasons .... they were chokers...so at the end of the day yeah they were competitive but what have they got to show for it.
The thing is NOBODY wants to play there. Regardless of the amount of cash they have, its a ****house place to play rugby league.
Macdouaggall, Sutton, Gulovou, Webb, Cusack, Mellor, Hegarty and co. are pretty handy players.
They are attracting better players all the time. In fact, I think they are Manly in 04.
Don't be surprised if they sign a big name centre for example next year.
I;d take Hegarty on our wing. I'd take Gulovou or Cusack as our props.
One prop who plays for NZ (world champs, means nothing, you and I both know Int rugby league is dead). Still not convinced.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
3 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
4 | Warriors | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -4 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Cowboys | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | -10 | 10 |
7 | Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 39 | 8 |
8 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 8 |
9 | Tigers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 8 |
10 | Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | -8 | 8 |
11 | Rabbitohs | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -44 | 8 |
12 | Dolphins | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 6 |
13 | Roosters | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -52 | 6 |
14 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
15 | Knights | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -74 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -107 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |