Fine time - NRL rap of the Cheaters

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by ManlyBacker, Apr 13, 2005.



Share This Page

  1. ManlyBacker

    By:ManlyBackerApr 13, 2005
    Winging it
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,597
    Likes Received:
    843
    Likes Given:
    738
    Ratings:
    +972 /7
    Five clubs fined for cap breaches

    www.NRL.com
    13 April 2005


    The National Rugby League Board has endorsed a total of $275,000 in fines recommended for Salary Cap breaches established in the 2004 audits.

    The Board also today gave in principle support for proposed changes to 'Third Party Agreements' which would allow players to earn more money from club sponsors.

    Five clubs, the Bulldogs, the Storm, the Roosters, the Dragons, the Panthers, have been fined amounts ranging from $25,000 to $120,000.

    In approving the recommendations today, the NRL Board noted that the breaches were mostly of a minor nature and that they did not amount to a systematic attempt to breach the cap.

    However, the Board stressed that the success of the 2005 competition was a reminder of the importance of the Salary Cap in the game and of the need to maintain strict governance.

    In the case of the Bulldogs, the fine relates primarily to the sudden loss of sponsorship revenues early last year.

    The club had entered the season entitled to a Salary Cap allowance for sponsorship servicing and had contracted players on this basis.

    The club fully disclosed the issue along with two minor payment breaches.

    In the case of Melbourne, which has been locked into ongoing Salary Cap issues, the breaches relate to contracts dating back to 2001 and the fine is the total for breaches over that period.

    The Storm's new management has made every effort to ensure that all matters have been fully disclosed and that all current agreements comply fully with the cap.

    The full list of fines is as follows:

    Club: Bulldogs
    Amount: $72,295
    Reason: Sponsor servicing shortfall

    Club: Dragons
    Amount: $32,286
    Reason: Second Tier salary cap breach

    Club: Panthers
    Amount: $25,000
    Reason: Late payment of club loan to a player

    Club: Roosters
    Amount: $25,000
    Reason: Third party agreement

    Club: Storm
    Amount: $120,000
    Reason: Third party contracts from 2001

    Clubs have five business days to respond to the breach notices.

    As a result of today's meeting, all 15 clubs and the RLPA will be consulted over the final details of future Salary Cap changes which will allow greater freedom in relation to endorsement contracts between club sponsors and players.

    Under current guidelines players are free to earn any amount from companies who are not club sponsors but payments from club sponsors must be included either as part of an approved club sponsor servicing allowance or within the Salary Cap.
     
  2. The Wheel

    By:The WheelApr 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member
    2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,670
    Likes Received:
    1,145
    Likes Given:
    762
    Ratings:
    +3,263 /99
    Forget the fines take their competition points - more chance of us making the finals then.
     
  3. PEPSI

    By:PEPSIApr 13, 2005
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,578
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2 /0
    thats chicken feed for all those clubs, its worth paying that much if it means keeping or attracting better players than if you didnt rort the system
     
  4. Fluffy

    By:FluffyApr 13, 2005
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,326
    Likes Received:
    1,841
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,597 /254
    yup - its 1 average games gate takings. (2 for melbourne)

    At 20 bucks its only a crowd of 13,750 needed.

    Interesting that Des got fined from memory something like 40K for having a go at the poor refereeing. Seems cheating isnt worth as much
     
  5. fLIP

    By:fLIPApr 13, 2005
    UFO Hunter

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    7,182
    Likes Received:
    505
    Likes Given:
    155
    Ratings:
    +2,001 /50
    Does anyone remember Ricky Stuart ever denying 3rd party involvment in their player payments????

    I want too see more than money taken from these clubs. They were all top 8 sides. Thats no coincidense.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top