Eagles eye bad boy

ManlyBacker

Winging it
As suggested on these forums earlier, Sa could be heading to Manly.

"THE Sea Eagles are keeping a distant eye on the future of Roosters utility Setaimata Sa who could end up in maroon and white next year.

The 22-year-old New Zealand international pleaded not guilty this week in Waverley Court to allegations of assaulting a police officer at the Coogee Bay Hotel in August.

But Sa did plead guilty to allegations of refusing to leave licenced premises, maliciously damaging property and resisting arrest.

Despite his background, the Sea Eagles are sniffing about if Sa, as expected, is released by the Roosters.

Sa has connections at Manly and we hear the coaching staff do rate him. The youngster has been stood down indefinitely by the Roosters."


http://manly-daily.whereilive.com.au/sport/story/blindside39/
 
I don't mind Sa, think he is quite a handy footballer. If he gets his attitude adjusted he could be a good buy.
 
I agree he has some skill and he could benefit from a more disciplined regime such as Des runs. Or it could back fire even more
 
Dan link said:
I agree he has some skill and he could benefit from a more disciplined regime such as Des runs. Or it could back fire even more
  I would suggest the notion of a disciplined regime lies in tatters after the last 9 months.
 
I don't think anything would get the laziness out of williams, so barring that example I mean fitness and on field disiplinr matas. And certainly over all DES would rank higher than fittler in the discipline regime stakes anyway
 
Buy him - the competition it would add might give Matai the rocket up the ass he needs. Also, we need more bad boys in the backline. Robbo, Wolf, Stewy, Lyon and Ox don't scare anyone.
 
Sa won't get to the UK due to his record. Manly have a 'beyond the bridge' policy which keeps players out of the city which seems to circumvent many of the problems. Might be a good buy!!!
 
Has the 'no dickheads policy' been replaced by a 'beyond the bridge' policy?  I guess that means a 'no Kings Cross' policy only, as it couldn't include a 'no Mascot airport' policy.  Does this policy work in reverse?  How do some of the guys get to work?  Or is 'the bridge' the Captain Cook bridge?  and meant to the pissheads away from Northy's.         
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

2025 Ladder

Team P W D L PD Pts
1 Raiders 24 19 0 5 148 44
2 Storm 24 17 0 7 212 40
3 Bulldogs 24 16 0 8 120 38
4 Broncos 24 15 0 9 172 36
5 Sharks 24 15 0 9 109 36
6 Warriors 24 14 0 10 21 34
7 Panthers 24 13 1 10 107 33
8 Roosters 24 13 0 11 132 32
9 Dolphins 24 12 0 12 125 30
10 Sea Eagles 24 12 0 12 21 30
11 Eels 24 10 0 14 -76 26
12 Cowboys 24 9 1 14 -146 25
13 Tigers 24 9 0 15 -135 24
14 Rabbitohs 24 9 0 15 -181 24
15 Dragons 24 8 0 16 -130 22
16 Titans 24 6 0 18 -199 18
17 Knights 24 6 0 18 -300 18
Back
Top Bottom