Is that about Munster?
As for DCE, a few years ago wasn't he rumoured to have been wanting Toovey replaced as part of his backflip deal? (Could be wrong about that)
Fiz is the only Manly player that had 2 get out clauses regarding his coach - 1 with Manly and the next with Parra.There is cetainly stuff out there that insinuates cherry wanted changes to the footy dept to backflip. Its a good question to what those changes are. 6 weeks later toovey was gone. It may have been a coincidence , who knows. The cherry evans fan club must know and wont tell us , because they are of the opinion it was anything but tooves,
Maybe this is where manly lost its furniture. Council pickup but was never replaced. maybe it was stand up ergonomic work benches with no bench. Im sure that was his backflip request. Or as mentioned previously high vis changes.
It would be handy if people do know what those changes were, to inform us so we can stop speculating . If they dont , well they dont know either
Fiz is the only Manly player that had 2 get out clauses regarding his coach - 1 with Manly and the next with Parra.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/foran-to-finally-sign-nrl-deal-with-eels
'Dalai will take me to the next level' Thread is 100% Fiz 😎
Chez's backflip was 100% financial.
Get 1 million for 3 years or
get 1+ million for 6 years with a 2 year option for his extending another 2 years
Chez waited 4 years to get his Rep jersey back and we're to believe that he disses his Roos Coach Henry![]()
Simply put, Chez signed with a basket case Titans outfit when they came up with an offer as there was no Manly offer at the time.Cherry didnt need a coach clause as he was a free agent. There are many suggestions that money AND footy dept changes were part of his deal. I have no doubt coin was a factor but do you have any info that proves or disproves that he wanted footy club changes as well.and if so what were they. What if he wanted toovey gone. Does that change our impression. For me absolutely
It could be all bull****. I get that, but it begs the question. Generally the truth lay somewhat inbetween.
Im very suspect of cherry and i believe your impressions are somewhat opposite. And probably the truth lay somewhat in the middle. And im sure we could debate our points for an eternity as we both have in numerous cherry threads. It would be great if we had real intel so our emotional responses are better formed.
Especially in light of the rubbish that gets about. We all hate journalist and there info and then watmough goes live, tells it how he sees it he is lying. Faaark me
Simply put, Chez signed with a basket case Titans outfit when they came up with an offer as there was no Manly offer at the time.
Chez was in no position to select coaches at Manly or even at the Titans.
The length of his upgraded Manly contract was the real dealbreaker and the cause of so many negative articles.
To get a 'contract for life' that keeps abreast of any Cap increase was the objective![]()
Henry and Chez could really have fun with this and show up the Media hacks 😀Can everyone see the scene? Neil Henry sitting at the Breakfast table in New Zealand, reading the paper.
"Hey DCE, come read this mate"
DCE takes paper, reads it, crumples it up, and walks off to the toilet - appropriate use of the Telegraph.
Print the legend.I once heard the phrase that it is not a reporters job to tell the news, it is to make the news. Whether it be true or not.
That is why these clowns still have jobs, report something that's not true and have the forces of nature make it happen. Doesn't matter if it stuffs up lives because they don't care!
It sounds similar to our politicians, they don't give a rats about us either.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 8 |
2 | Warriors | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 8 |
3 | Sea Eagles | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 52 | 6 |
4 | Broncos | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 44 | 6 |
5 | Storm | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 38 | 6 |
6 | Titans | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 22 | 6 |
7 | Rabbitohs | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 6 |
8 | Raiders | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 6 |
9 | Knights | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -4 | 6 |
10 | Tigers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 4 |
11 | Sharks | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 4 |
12 | Dragons | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -3 | 4 |
13 | Panthers | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -16 | 2 |
14 | Cowboys | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -54 | 2 |
15 | Roosters | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -56 | 2 |
16 | Dolphins | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -36 | 0 |
17 | Eels | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -86 | 0 |