So I see DCE had a subtle dig at player managers and how its often forgotten when it comes to players and a club.
We always look at the club or the player when a player moves on BUT DCE made it pretty clear that there is a third party which actually has more to do with the whole process and they hold the power, they are often overlooked.. The MANAGER.
ESPECIALLY when it comes to younger player and how they are basically "shipped" off to another club without the club that brought them through the juniors having much say in it.
So they are now looking at introducing a 10 day cooling off period or last right of approach where the CLUB has 10 days to convince the player to stay ( ALA- the Back flip clause that was canned after DCE back flipped).
But even with this DCE mentions that at the end the player goes where the manager wants them to go and he feels there needs to be better governance around player managers. ( I'm guessing this may have a bit to do with a few of our junior pathways players being "shipped" out in the last 2 season)
it also goes to show that the club and the players feel the impact as well and hopefully this should shut up a few of the negative posters on here who constantly bang on about the clubs management not retaining certain players blah blah.
In short they have no option!
We always look at the club or the player when a player moves on BUT DCE made it pretty clear that there is a third party which actually has more to do with the whole process and they hold the power, they are often overlooked.. The MANAGER.
ESPECIALLY when it comes to younger player and how they are basically "shipped" off to another club without the club that brought them through the juniors having much say in it.
So they are now looking at introducing a 10 day cooling off period or last right of approach where the CLUB has 10 days to convince the player to stay ( ALA- the Back flip clause that was canned after DCE back flipped).
But even with this DCE mentions that at the end the player goes where the manager wants them to go and he feels there needs to be better governance around player managers. ( I'm guessing this may have a bit to do with a few of our junior pathways players being "shipped" out in the last 2 season)
it also goes to show that the club and the players feel the impact as well and hopefully this should shut up a few of the negative posters on here who constantly bang on about the clubs management not retaining certain players blah blah.
In short they have no option!