manly should dispute Buhrer,s part in the tackleDaniel said:Yeah I can't believe he was charged, he had no involvement in the dangerous part at all. Lussick should be the only one charged there.
manly should dispute Buhrer,s part in the tackleDaniel said:Yeah I can't believe he was charged, he had no involvement in the dangerous part at all. Lussick should be the only one charged there.
ALinda said:Don't agree with just 'accepting' Jamie's charge but I guess Manly have their reasons which I'll respect. Only hope it doesn't come back to haunt us down the track.
SeaEagleRock8 said:ALinda said:Don't agree with just 'accepting' Jamie's charge but I guess Manly have their reasons which I'll respect. Only hope it doesn't come back to haunt us down the track.
I haven't studied any videos but from what I did see I assumed it was just a mistake that Buhrer was charged.
Did we accept it just to save on legal fees for the hearing? Very strange. Maybe the club decision makers think he is such a clean player that the carry over points will never beome an issue.
Team | P | W | D | L | PD | Pts | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Bulldogs | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 74 | 14 |
2 | Warriors | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
3 | Storm | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 78 | 12 |
4 | Raiders | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 58 | 12 |
5 | Broncos | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 78 | 10 |
6 | Sharks | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 49 | 10 |
7 | Sea Eagles | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | 10 |
8 | Tigers | 9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 10 |
9 | Cowboys | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | -14 | 10 |
10 | Dragons | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -14 | 8 |
11 | Roosters | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -42 | 8 |
12 | Knights | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | -48 | 8 |
13 | Rabbitohs | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | -70 | 8 |
14 | Dolphins | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
15 | Titans | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -68 | 6 |
16 | Eels | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -117 | 6 |
17 | Panthers | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | -26 | 4 |