Burgess twins

[Harvies elbow]

Some talk around today that we might be interested in these two.
Would you be?
Maybe 150-200k imo which would rule them out......
So no from me.

 

[Ryan]

They are only 24, so yes. My concern is that I'd worry about their fitness levels under a Manly regime.

 

[Peter C]

Not after seeing the way George was throwing his punchesagianst the Knights.
As for Tom, I don't think he ever really had it.

 

[Haliaeetus]

no thanks

 

[The Wheel]

I think Luke experience should keep us away from the Burgess brothers, even Sam

 

[Harvies elbow]

All depends on the price.

Both have a lot of potential and would serve a purpose but only at the right price.

And I reckon their asking price would take up the best part of a mil so out of the question.

 

[sheridanstand78]

A big NO!!! We dont need the Burgess circus at our club!

 

[The Bagman]

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!

 

[Freagle]

I think you'd find their price would be falling week by week. 1 in ressies. The other on the verge, now suspension.

I'm my opinion, they'd be no where near $500k each for their next contracts.

Agreed - and probably why the rumours are starting to circulate, as the club begins to shop them around. Nice to think that we don't need or want them now. Two years ago would have been a different story!

 

[Deleted member 26876]

No..

 

[Eagleheart]

Negative, absolutely not, never, no way, by no means.

 

[mike walker]

G'day all,Worse hands than Watmough the pair of them.
cheers mike

 

[HappilyManly]

Their focus is on the Eastern Suburb's party scene.

They have the physical size but no footy nous
Without Sam, those two are lazy as

Big no

 

[Smokin Joe]

They are bench players at best nowadays,if we weren't prepared to pay much to keep Vave then nah,pass......

 

[manlywarringah]

I'd take George but I think they'd want to be a package.

Tom is not worth as much. If $800,000 could get them both, I wouldn't mind.

George at his best is one of the most damaging forwards in the game.

 

[ManWar]

Negative, absolutely not, never, no way, by no means.

Put you down for a 'no' then?

 

[Go manly]

I am and have been very welcoming to new players

But I would struggle supporting my team with those two souffs sydney grubby scum sucking disease ridden cheap shot merchants who have their heads up there ass and who play for the most unsuccessful side in the modern era and should never been allowed back in the comp

Dityo thier mum
I guess it's a no from me

 

[midsteyne]

Do we get the widow burgess in the package,hope not!

 

[Clint]

Put you down for a 'no' then?

I think that was a maybe.

 

[Eagleheart]

I think that was a maybe.

Oh dear, now Clint do I need to be a bit clearer.............

Nay, nope, no go, not on any account, no siree, nae, naw, negatory and not in any degree, way, or under any condition..................