Bryant - the no name shows them up

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by ManlyBacker, Mar 12, 2006.



Share This Page

  1. ManlyBacker

    By:ManlyBackerMar 12, 2006
    Winging it
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    11,597
    Likes Received:
    843
    Likes Given:
    738
    Ratings:
    +972 /7
    Well done Mark on another great display. You don't get a write-up in the Manly Daily, you are probably lucky to see your name listed at nrl.com and you don't get mentioned when the engine room is talked about.

    Well, not for much longer. Keep up the great work and you should be rewarded with a starting spot in front of a few pretenders.
    :clap: :clap: :clap:
     
  2. sue ridgepipe

    By:sue ridgepipeMar 12, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    100% agree
     
  3. Guest

    By:GuestMar 12, 2006
    Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    I thought Kylie was also very impressive.
     
  4. Matabele

    By:MatabeleMar 12, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    Bryant is probably on $50k or less and knows each game could be his last.

    This contrasts with players of profile like the Princess who have had money showered down on them from high and who don't give a stuff about getting those 1% effort things right.

    I reckon a team full of Bryants would win a Premiership over a team full of Kings, even if they did cop the occasional flogging when the King team decided to play for the day.
     
  5. Blunty

    By:BluntyMar 12, 2006
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    He made a couple of good hits I suppose, and I was impressed, but stats really don't lie.

    King made 30 more metres than him. I'm not saying King had a barnstormer, but for the time he played I felt it was an improvement on last year.

    And for anyone(Sue) who says Kite was below par, you have got to be kidding yourself. Kite hit like a demon in defense for the 22 tackles he made, not to mention the 120 odd metres he chewed up.
     
  6. Matabele

    By:MatabeleMar 12, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    I personally though King wasn't as bad as everyone was saying. His attack was reasonable, but in defence..........

    Bryant was 2nd best after Kite for mine.
     
  7. KaZa

    By:KaZaMar 12, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,155
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +402 /24
    I said it last week.. Bryant is our best prop. Hes a machine. Kite was ok last night.. but he can play better than that. King was ok..

    Biggest dissapointment for me.. was our usually reliable 2nd row and lock. Beaver BK and Watmough were poor to their standard. Bell and Hicks have work to do on their defence communication.
     
  8. the_parts

    By:the_partsMar 12, 2006
    New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Yeh Bryant played very well, and put some great hits on.

    If King doesn't improve in the next game or two, then he should be put to PL. Lets face it, he is plain 'shi t'.
     
  9. Fluffy

    By:FluffyMar 12, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2004
    Messages:
    20,465
    Likes Received:
    1,872
    Likes Given:
    24
    Ratings:
    +6,813 /266
    bryants hit was awsome last night - one of the highlights

    he did well off the bench - a shame lulu couldnt do the same, last just 5 minutes after half time
     
  10. sue ridgepipe

    By:sue ridgepipeMar 13, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    blunty

    kite is an origin player who is on 330k a year.like orford (who is on 400+ and was dissappointing also in his first game) he is to be judged on the standards suggested by his price tag,not on a comparison to a ****ing princess.standing flatfooted as a 30 year old hooker runs by is not befitting a player of his standing. if you think that is how origin props should perform then you probably have wet dreams about jason ryles also.
    he is a good player at his best but i dont think manly has seen it as yet on a consistent basis.the club has been dissappointed with him given what he was supposed to bring.

    and for those people still protecting king have a look at that fellow Scott for the cowgirls.he has a huge reputation up north also as an up and coming prop.Thats what "potential" looks like.

    on a totally unrelated point i can never understand this metre gained thing unless it is way out there over 150.king made 90 metres and never looked like offloading or threatening the defence and indeed went backwards,kite made 120 but hardly ever stretched the advantage line.it is a quantitative measure with no qualitative assessment.the best judjement is using your eyes to see the effect a player has on the game.mitchell seargent made 54 metres off 7 hitups and mathew scott 86 metres off 12 hitups against the broncos.who stood out in your eyes.
     
  11. Matabele

    By:MatabeleMar 13, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2004
    Messages:
    23,081
    Likes Received:
    457
    Likes Given:
    63
    Ratings:
    +516 /14
    What Mitchell Sargeant bought to the game that our props didn't:

    1. Quick play the balls.
    2. Decoy running.
    3. Occasional offload to create doubt in defenders' minds.
    4. Backing up (notice he handled twice in that long range try early in the second half).

    This in opposition to two international legends.
     
  12. sue ridgepipe

    By:sue ridgepipeMar 13, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,310
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    the play the ball speed was the obvious difference in the Manly Canberra game to others over the weekend.this depends on coaching and attitude,not ability,which is a real worry.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top