Better - but still a lot of improvement needed

Discussion in 'Rugby League Forum' started by Crushercleal, Mar 25, 2006.



Share This Page

  1. Crushercleal

    By:CrusherclealMar 25, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    1,065
    Likes Received:
    1
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    While I was ecstatic with the win, and cheered hoarse for 40 min from the Hill (the other 40 min was shouting abuse at Hapstead, who has no sense of what holding-down in the tackle means), let's be honest - a decent team would have hammered us tonight. Here are the problems:
    1. Absolutely zero structure in attack. We don't know what to do near the tryline. We have no set moves, no decoy runners, and no last tackle kicking options.
    2. Kite and King largely ineffective. They don't have an impact on the game in attack. Cuthbo was far more impressive in my opinion. He can make metres, and actually offloads. He HAS to start.
    3. Dropped balls. Why do we drop so much?
    What we did well:
    1. Defence near the line - was much better in the 2nd half
    2. Bell - he has to get more ball. Why did he barely touch it for 40 min?
    3. Halves/hookers - looked much more balanced with less chopping and changing.
     
  2. easystreet

    By:easystreetMar 25, 2006
    Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    The defence seems to be improving each week,but there was still far too much drop ball,especially in the first half.
     
  3. Ryan

    By:RyanMar 25, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    17,577
    Likes Received:
    4,325
    Likes Given:
    722
    Ratings:
    +12,674 /555
    Mate - I thought the Sharks had a pretty handy team on the park:-

    Albert - Grand Final Winner
    Kimmorley - Aust. 1/2 back once
    Dykes - Experience +
    Ross - SOO
    Bailey - SOO
    Simmons - Was well contained

    etc etc...
     
  4. KaZa

    By:KaZaMar 25, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Messages:
    2,159
    Likes Received:
    203
    Likes Given:
    19
    Ratings:
    +412 /29
    I think the problem is the same as last year. Monas was the only option... and it seems Orford is the same option. Burns is a good player.. but he hasnt been helping out alot in attack.. credit to the kid in the 2nd half he got more involved and was better for it. But first half he was non existent. He has to realise.. hes got to take some pressure off Orford..

    I liked how the Sharks used their fullback in attack.. its the sort of play we should have for Stewy.
     
  5. Garts

    By:GartsMar 26, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +947 /27
    Burns was non existant in the 1st half as we spent the majority of it trying to get out of our own half. The kid will improve every game!!!
     
  6. earl

    By:earlMar 26, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,151
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    We need orford to control the game. If he can do 50% of what Johns did on Friday night were in with a good show.
     
  7. Guest

    By:GuestMar 26, 2006
    Guest

    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Alberts best days were years ago. he has lost a lot of speed and is pretty ordinary.
    Kimmorley - suffered a groin strain last night ans was really a passenger for most of the game
    Dykes - Ok in attack but again his best days were years ago before he left to go to Parra
    Ross - suffered a badly broken nose and possible busted cheekbone which effected his play
    Baily - this guys is rubbish and overrated
    Simmons - ditto.

    Also no vagana, gallen or Pomery.

    In reaility we should have smahsed this team by 20 points. We just have no structure in the teams plays whether it be defence of attack. We rely too much on individual brilliance from bell and stewart to score our tries.

    No wonder des and orford have had a disagreement. Orford no doubt wants to structure our attack while des is saying no lets keep it as a dogs breakfast.
     
  8. Nutzcraw

    By:NutzcrawMar 26, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,826
    Likes Received:
    4
    Likes Given:
    12
    Ratings:
    +4 /0
    Full credit to Ben Ross.... showed alot of courage coming back on!
     
  9. Corso_Pete

    By:Corso_PeteMar 26, 2006
    Well-Known Member
    Premium Member 2018 Tipping Competitor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,482
    Likes Received:
    40
    Likes Given:
    22
    Ratings:
    +57 /0
    I agree with you Tookey, I thought that the Sharks team minus Vagana at Brookie, should have been easy pickings for us and I expected a convincing win. Our lack of structure in attack is most concering, other than Bell we really seem to have little hope of scoring tries.

    Would you like to expand on the Orford/Hasler disagreement. I have not heard of this before.
     
  10. Garts

    By:GartsMar 26, 2006
    Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2005
    Messages:
    5,603
    Likes Received:
    394
    Likes Given:
    76
    Ratings:
    +947 /27
    I have little confidence in our attack at the moment, I am hoping it will just click all of a sudden.

    The Raiders have had 130 points put on them in 2 games, we could only manage 14 :doh:
     
  11. earl

    By:earlMar 26, 2006
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,151
    Likes Received:
    0
    Likes Given:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 /0
    Early days , Early days,
    Just saw the replay on the news. What a great movement for Bells try.
    Great vision from Burns , and Steve bell , well , i think he is a better buy than Orford.
    Only good days ahead. !pray:
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice
Top